- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/10/09 at 11:16 am to MetArl15
quote:
I disagree with this. Why shouldn't we expect that. Obviously the talent level in LA in a given year has a huge bearing on this, but given LA's location, even with subpar instate talent, there is enough talent within a 6-7 hrs drive of Baton Rouge to expect this every year or at least every 3 out of 4.
Based on rivals rankings since 2002, we have 4 out of 8 classes finishing lower than top 5. 3 of those were out of the top 10.
So either your expectations are too high or you think Miles and Saban aren't very good recruiters. Get used to disappointment.
Posted on 4/10/09 at 11:17 am to Cajun61
Honestly, I don't know. Probably between 20-25. I hope we go light this year to prepare for 2011 which is looking outstanding.
Posted on 4/10/09 at 11:19 am to nitwit
quote:Sure don't....It's a recruiting board. I don't get why you people come here and talk about how its too early to talk about certian things, thats what recruiting is.
Just one person's view , but don't you think it's a wee bit erly to make these types of assessments?
Posted on 4/10/09 at 11:20 am to TexasTigah
quote:
I don't get why you people come here and talk about how its too early to talk about certian things, thats what recruiting is.
How you think that class of 3027 is shaping up?
Posted on 4/10/09 at 11:21 am to Cussian
quote:Yeah because talking about this current class is the same as that.
How you think that class of 3027 is shaping up?
Posted on 4/10/09 at 12:36 pm to TexasTigah
quote:
Probably between 20-25. I hope we go light this year to prepare for 2011 which is looking outstanding.
I believe we will go light this year...
Posted on 4/10/09 at 1:32 pm to Cajun61
Our team this year has alot to prove on the field and off. Meaning, recruits noticed we didnt do so well last year. Most if not all have discarded that season as unfortunate and due to special circumstances. We have alot riding on this year for our record, reputation, and recruiting. The best recruiting tool in the world is winning.
So, its way too early to assume anything at this point. Evaluations are very incomplete at this time as far as the recruiting sites go. The state talent is lower than last year, but we have much more interest from out of state players. We will do just fine. Its absurd to try and predict how well our class will be, but most would agree it should be close to or within the top 10. A good season this year will go a long way.
So, its way too early to assume anything at this point. Evaluations are very incomplete at this time as far as the recruiting sites go. The state talent is lower than last year, but we have much more interest from out of state players. We will do just fine. Its absurd to try and predict how well our class will be, but most would agree it should be close to or within the top 10. A good season this year will go a long way.
Posted on 4/10/09 at 1:36 pm to tigerbill002
I think what is more important is that we are addressing needs early on, that we didnt address as much last year. We are off to a good start.
Last year
1 FB
1 S
1 WR
0 CB
0 TE
2 Ath
This year
1 FB
1 S
0 CB
1 WR
1 TE
1 Ath
Last year
1 FB
1 S
1 WR
0 CB
0 TE
2 Ath
This year
1 FB
1 S
0 CB
1 WR
1 TE
1 Ath
Posted on 4/10/09 at 1:52 pm to Cussian
quote:
Based on rivals rankings since 2002, we have 4 out of 8 classes finishing lower than top 5. 3 of those were out of the top 10.
People still look at the junk rivals post? I thought everybody smartened up to them.
Posted on 4/10/09 at 3:31 pm to Cajun61
I guess it's a good think we didn't have the #1 class then.
Posted on 4/10/09 at 3:51 pm to tigerbill002
quote:
People still look at the junk rivals post? I thought everybody smartened up to them.
Why would you stop looking at the only ranking worth looking at? Just because someone else has your team ranked higher doesn't mean they are bad....
quote:
This year
1 FB
1 S
0 CB
1 WR
1 TE
1 Ath
I didn't know "athlete" could be a position of need.
Posted on 4/11/09 at 9:54 am to xeno
quote:
I didn't know "athlete" could be a position of need.
It is if youre Washington State
Posted on 4/11/09 at 1:08 pm to xeno
Well Xeno, let me clear it up for you, since its coming along a little slow for you today.
Athlete in this instance (if you know which players I am talking about) could address CB/S/WR/RB. All of those positions were needs. Hows that.
M. Claiborne - WR/S/CB
D. Calhoun - WR/CB/RB
T. Simon - WR/CB/S.
Do you get it now. Is it clear enough for you now.
Athlete in this instance (if you know which players I am talking about) could address CB/S/WR/RB. All of those positions were needs. Hows that.
M. Claiborne - WR/S/CB
D. Calhoun - WR/CB/RB
T. Simon - WR/CB/S.
Do you get it now. Is it clear enough for you now.
Posted on 4/11/09 at 1:31 pm to tigerbill002
quote:
Do you get it now. Is it clear enough for you now.
Do it with someone he might be familiar with...like Harvin.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News