Started By
Message

re: Scout 100 is out

Posted on 3/23/09 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

TxTiger25


Sorry, I really thought you were, but the double does of sarcasm got me.

next time don't forget the [sarcasm][/sarcasm] tags.
Posted by Teacher
Member since Sep 2006
3060 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 1:54 pm to
Not to worry we have many La in the top 250 to come later.
Posted by tigerjake
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2004
2827 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Dyer 26 and a 4*...horrible
Sounds about right to me.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25422 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Sounds about right to me.


I gotta hear this...
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24738 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 4:35 pm to
Dyer's ranking is an absolute joke. He will be top 10 by the end of the process.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25422 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 4:43 pm to
Well TJake thinks its just about right...
Posted by tigerjake
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2004
2827 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Well TJake thinks its just about right...
#26 is a 5-star in the final rankings jackass. What more do you want? Seastrunk and Lattimore are better backs IMO. Lynx thinks Dyer is better then Lattimore...I don't.
Posted by tigerjake
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2004
2827 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

I gotta hear this...
Your on an LSU board, so if you don't like it GTFO. By the way, Dyer is not a hog yet.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24738 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

#26 is a 5-star in the final rankings jackass. What more do you want? Seastrunk and Lattimore are better backs IMO. Lynx thinks Dyer is better then Lattimore...I don't.


I think they are very similar backs in ability...to the point where they should be ranked within one or two spots of one another. Both belong in the 8-10 range in my opinion.

Seastrunk's senior year will be very telling as to whether I think he should be ranked ahead of those two or behind. I would lean towards putting him in the 15 range due to him not being an every down back. Lattimore and Dyer will carry the load for their respective teams--I do not ever see Lache in that role.

Posted by tigerjake
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2004
2827 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

I think they are very similar backs in ability...to the point where they should be ranked within one or two spots of one another. Both belong in the 8-10 range in my opinion.

Seastrunk's senior year will be very telling as to whether I think he should be ranked ahead of those two or behind. I would lean towards putting him in the 15 range due to him not being an every down back. Lattimore and Dyer will carry the load for their respective teams--I do not ever see Lache in that role.
I agree Lynx, but Lache is a different back who can do things that those two cannot. Hes a Reggie Bush type college player, and plays wayyyyy better competition then Dyer. Dyer and Lattimore are two backs that are close talent wise, but Lattimore has played better competition too.
This post was edited on 3/23/09 at 6:31 pm
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
55027 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 6:51 pm to
Looks like LSU is on 16 of the top 100 players list..

Notre Dame stands out and so does UNC.. Listed a bunch
Posted by blackbeaver69
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2008
1395 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 8:23 pm to
pawprints i heard from a reliable source that your a goat fricker.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25422 posts
Posted on 3/23/09 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

I agree Lynx, but Lache is a different back who can do things that those two cannot. Hes a Reggie Bush type college player, and plays wayyyyy better competition then Dyer. Dyer and Lattimore are two backs that are close talent wise, but Lattimore has played better competition too.


What can lache do that Dyer can't? And who said Dyer was a Hog? I also guess that DMAC kid was shitty too...you know since he played against lower competition that Dyer??
Posted by pawprints
La
Member since Mar 2008
565 posts
Posted on 3/24/09 at 7:59 am to
were you watching?
Edit:
Pulled up your profile its seems you have a thing for Goats. Three out of four post you mention sexual relation with a goat. Nice! You obviously think about goat a great deal.
This post was edited on 3/24/09 at 8:22 am
Posted by tigerjake
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2004
2827 posts
Posted on 3/24/09 at 8:51 am to
quote:

What can lache do that Dyer can't?
First, I never said Dyer will not be a great back, but I just think hes the 3rd best back in the country behind Lache and Lattimore. Second, if you think Lache can't do things that Dyer can't, then you need to go back and watch film on Seastrunk. They are different style backs(Dyer and Lattimore are close to the same style).
Posted by xeno
Member since Dec 2008
331 posts
Posted on 3/24/09 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Dyer's ranking is an absolute joke. He will be top 10 by the end of the process.

Did you really expect scout to release anything competent?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram