- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RMD- Vote on 107
Posted on 5/4/10 at 4:29 pm to OldIowaTiger
Posted on 5/4/10 at 4:29 pm to OldIowaTiger
I still don't have everyone's. I'd like to get a few more before I calculate. I think I'm at roughly .500
Posted on 5/4/10 at 7:42 pm to OBUDan
quote:
I still don't have everyone's. I'd like to get a few more before I calculate. I think I'm at roughly .500
I don't know OBUDan. I like the one and only public ranking provided so far. Let's just go with that one.
Here it is for reference:
1. Pasty Skanster - By no means the run away number 1 pick, but picked solid players through out and didn't get hung up on needing skill position players early.
2. jembert - I thought Jordan Allen was a little bit of a reach, but other than that a very solid team. Woods will be a stud.
3. OldIowaTiger - Could have the best first 3 players of anybody. After that the next couple is not the way I would have went.
4. SunTiger - I'm not big on the Seastrunk/Reed combo, but he made up for it latter in the draft. The 2 replacement picks brought him way up.
5. BayouCatFan - Solid team. Not really any picks I say I wouldn't have even considered that.
6. Dro - If you want to know if going after skilled positions is the way to go this is the team to watch.
7. 102632 - Really did the best he could picking last.
8. TigerPhanatick - I don't know why I have this team rated so low the more I look at them the more I like.
9. Lynxcat - I think he might have gotten Silberman in the 3rd.
10. Hand - Might be the best pure picks here, but not swapping dropped him from a probable top 3 to 10th.
11. Hidden Flask - Ithought he reached a little bit for some players. The knocker was Bell.
12. OBUDan - Once again a top 5 type team dropped because of Coleman and then not picking a OL with the 2 extra picks.
13. mgdtiger - I want Lewis Damn it. Swapping your 3rd round pick doesn't look good.
14. Yetty - Did a little reaching IMO starting with Davis.
15. Harry3740 - Swapped a 4th round pick, but at 15 I like this team. I wouldn't have taken a back in the first.
16. GulfCoastBiased - Solid WRs and DL but I don't know
17. TSB4L - Again a team in a hurry to get a QB, and this might cloud my judgement but I'm not a DJ Morgan fan
18. joechristoppher77 - He went LSU, but I think he reached alot. QB number 1 doesn't help.
19. OUandLSUfan - Maybe what he drafted will work for him. IDK.
Just my thoughts feel free to tear my team apart.

Posted on 5/4/10 at 8:15 pm to PastySkankster
quote:
PastySkankster



This post was edited on 5/4/10 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 5/4/10 at 8:20 pm to crowbar832001
quote:
otherwise we would have a new number 1.
Only time will tell. I look forward to finding out how this plays out. I am doing another one currently, and it is quite different. Solomon Patton went in Rd 1! He went in Rd 11 or something in the TD draft.

Posted on 5/5/10 at 7:46 am to PastySkankster
Hey Pasty, I think I like that ranking as well.
Posted on 5/5/10 at 6:43 pm to jembeurt
I think the BCF Badasses were screwed!!!
Posted on 5/6/10 at 1:29 pm to PastySkankster
I'm ok with those rankings.
Reed will be AU's go to guy when teams stack up to stop Dwyer and I like Seastrunk to run all over the PAC-10 defenses.

quote:
I'm not big on the Seastrunk/Reed combo
Reed will be AU's go to guy when teams stack up to stop Dwyer and I like Seastrunk to run all over the PAC-10 defenses.
Posted on 5/10/10 at 7:45 pm to Suntiger
Posted on 5/10/10 at 9:43 pm to PastySkankster
That sounds fricked up. He was acting crazy but no drugs on him? Why would he flip out for getting pulled over for "Following too closely." Seems fishy.
Posted on 5/19/10 at 8:30 am to OBUDan
Bored let's pick a few more players



Posted on 6/4/10 at 7:34 am to OBUDan
Hey Dan,
When do we get the controversial rankings??
When do we get the controversial rankings??
Posted on 6/4/10 at 8:11 am to PastySkankster
Back on the first page!!!!!!!!
Posted on 6/4/10 at 5:48 pm to crowbar832001
We can't let it go until OBUDan steps out on the ledge...cough-cough...plank and makes his rankings!!


Posted on 6/20/10 at 11:34 pm to PastySkankster
Wow just realized one of my players died. Ohio State DE Jamel Turner.
Posted on 6/21/10 at 5:35 pm to OUandLSUfan
He's not dead. He's in critical condition though.
Posted on 6/29/10 at 2:34 pm to OBUDan
Bump for update:
OldIowaTiger, joechristoppher77 and I have had our guys dismissed from UCLA.
LINK
OldIowaTiger, joechristoppher77 and I have had our guys dismissed from UCLA.
quote:
UCLA has dismissed three incoming freshmen -- receiver Paul Richardson, defensive back Shaquille Richardson and linebacker Joshua Shirley -- who were arrested last week on felony theft charges for allegedly stealing a student's purse, the school announced in a press release.
The players could return to the team in January "if they meet certain requirements set by [coach Rick] Neuheisel." Additional discipline may be imposed by the office of the dean of students.
The three players were arrested on campus on June 23 by University Police.
“The three young men know they made a terrible mistake,” Neuheisel said in a statement. “We expect our players to behave a certain way and there are consequences when they don’t. Paul, Shaquille and Josh are paying a steep price for their lapse in judgment. They will not be allowed to enroll in school this fall and will not have the opportunity to begin their UCLA academic and athletic careers.
“Whether they are allowed to enroll for Winter Quarter will be determined at a later date. That decision will be based on several factors, including their behavior.”
LINK
Posted on 6/29/10 at 3:13 pm to Suntiger
Should have done a better job of looking at there backgrounds



Posted on 6/29/10 at 3:21 pm to 102362
quote:
Should have done a better job of looking at there backgrounds
Should have done a better job in grammar class.




Posted on 6/29/10 at 7:55 pm to TheHiddenFlask
quote:
Should have done a better job in grammar class.

Popular
Back to top
