Started By
Message

re: Mike Davis...

Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:35 pm to
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81400 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:35 pm to
you should've just logged off immediately like moneyg rather than prove to the world that you are a huge retard
Posted by Mitchell613
Lyon, France
Member since May 2008
890 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

you should've just logged off immediately like moneyg rather than prove to the world that you are a huge retard


I'm going to take a shot in the dark and say you didn't go to law school. You're just terrible at constructing an argument.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61791 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

lets have a loser leave the board forever bet on his draft status then. If he leaves after this year and goes outside of the first 2 rounds, i leave forever. If he goes rd 1 or 2, you leave forever. Deal?


I'll make this bet as long as I also get credit if he decides to stay in school (implicit you were wrong).
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61791 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

ok, humor me with all the 6'5 SEC WRs that have run 4.4 and went late in the draft


This is probably where you are going wrong.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81400 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

I'll make this bet as long as I also get credit if he decides to stay in school (implicit you were wrong).


wow, a backpedal that would make Patrick Peterson jealous.


Mitchell, have you named the "so many WRs" that you could list "right now" an hour ago YET?
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81400 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

This is probably where you are going wrong.


well, if moneyg says so. TT better give up sports altogether.
Posted by Mitchell613
Lyon, France
Member since May 2008
890 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Mitchell, have you named the "so many WRs" that you could list "right now" an hour ago YET?



No, but I wasn't required to. I only had to name one for you to stop posting forever.

Again, just terrible at constructing an argument.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61791 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

you should've just logged off immediately like moneyg rather than prove to the world that you are a huge retard


lol

says the guy who has spent the last hour and a half continuously monitoring a thread waiting for me to respond.

I just don't care enough to do that man. It just isn't that important to me. Sorry.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81400 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:42 pm to
you, on the other hand, are the F. Lee Bailey of ranter Reveille sportswriters posting from their Sharlo Townhome. I can list so many WRs RIGHT NOW that went later, I won't do it because...well just because.

If you only needed to name 1, why did you spend that extra 30 minutes on google to get Monk and the Oregon WR? Kinda proves you were trying to contstruct that failed list and not just listing the 1 to make me quit,huh? Nice argumentative skillz.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81400 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

I just don't care enough to do that man. It just isn't that important to me. Sorry.


Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61791 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

well, if moneyg says so. TT better give up sports altogether.


Ok. I'll offer you another bet.

If TT runs 4.40 or better like you said, I'll quit Tigerdroppings forever. If he doesn't, you're gone. Deal?
Posted by lsubeer
Denver
Member since Sep 2008
1234 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:43 pm to
Maybe the inability to develop and take advantage of talent is finally catching up to Miles?
Posted by Mitchell613
Lyon, France
Member since May 2008
890 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

Reveille sportswriters


Couldn't be more wrong.

quote:

Sharlo Townhome


Wrong again.

I didn't need google for Monk or Kent. You needed google to disqualify them, and Schilens, based on criterion you didn't state originally.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81400 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

If TT runs 4.40 or better like you said


i said 4.40? I love how you don't care enough to back up your original shite talking but you do care enough to bet the same exact stakes on an entirely new bet. Could you crawfish a little more?
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81400 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

I didn't need google for Monk or Kent. You needed google to disqualify them, and Schilens


you needed 30+ minutes to even come up with their names when repeatedly being prodded to list the names. But, of course you weren't just googling.
Posted by Mitchell613
Lyon, France
Member since May 2008
890 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:47 pm to
I didn't. But even if I did, does it matter?

You didn't say anything about search engines disqualifying receivers in your "I'll quit" statement.
This post was edited on 11/15/09 at 8:48 pm
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61791 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

i said 4.40? I love how you don't care enough to back up your original shite talking but you do care enough to bet the same exact stakes on an entirely new bet. Could you crawfish a little more?


You posted this...

quote:

ok, humor me with all the 6'5 SEC WRs that have run 4.4 and went late in the draft


This was in relation to your pissing contest with the other poster as proof that Toliver would be drafted high.

Go ahead and explain what you meant.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61791 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

love how you don't care enough to back up your original shite talking


I responded to your previous bet. It is you who haven't responded back.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81400 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:50 pm to
4.4 equals 4.40 or better? Again explain how you don't care enough to risk lifetime banishment on your original comments but you do care enough to make this bet?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61791 posts
Posted on 11/15/09 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

4.4 equals 4.40 or better?


Quit crawfishing and say what you meant. Did you mean 4.49 or better? Just clarify.

quote:

Again explain how you don't care enough to risk lifetime banishment on your original comments but you do care enough to make this bet?


Again, I did respond. Slow down the typing and spend a little more time reading.
This post was edited on 11/15/09 at 8:55 pm
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram