Started By
Message

re: Dyer vs. Seastrunk - who would you rather (for all schools)

Posted on 12/4/09 at 2:15 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Seastrunk = Percy Harvin

seastrunk is straightline

harvin is much more agile

seastrunk is faster
Posted by AuRob
Mobile, Al
Member since Aug 2008
777 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Regardless of size...he's hitting the edges...That's his MO...same with Holiday..


I agree, and I also agree with you on taking Dyer first. My point was Seastrunk, if he goes somewhere with the offensive intellectual capacity to utilize his talents he can be a much more complete player than Holliday. Holiday was a return specialist and a gimmick player used occasionally on offense.

I believe Seastrunk, with college strength and conditioning and coaching, can put up huge numbers in the right type of an offense. He is raw right now but he has feakish speed and athletic ability (see that photo of his vertical jump that has been posted on here a million times) and thats something that cant be taught. He isn't going to be a 20 carry a game type back but I think he can get 10-15 touches a game in a variety of ways and be a real difference maker.
This post was edited on 12/4/09 at 3:33 pm
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 4:11 pm to
I'll take Seastrunk. It is not often that talent like him can come to a school.
Posted by German Shepard
Berlin, Germany
Member since Jan 2009
1063 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

LSU brings him nothing to the table


Another dumb statement.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25557 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Another dumb statement.


What does it bring him? No imigination on Offense, no use of current weapons...a dismal offense...seriously?

BTW...these are issues with the O all courtesy of the Rant
Posted by German Shepard
Berlin, Germany
Member since Jan 2009
1063 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

issues with the O


Add a game breaking RB to the O and you have one of those issues solved.
Posted by InsightfulTiger
Member since Jul 2006
321 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 8:46 pm to
another ridiculous post...must be a decision between rubbing one out and posting something about Seastrunk at this point
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25557 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

Add a game breaking RB to the O and you have one of those issues solved.


He's not an everydown back...Unless Ford is the Truth...I don't see where it seriously upgrades the O at this point
Posted by German Shepard
Berlin, Germany
Member since Jan 2009
1063 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

He's not an everydown back


He is a serious talent. Whoever gets him is getting a big weapon. Every down, every other down, every three downs...whatever.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25557 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

He is a serious talent. Whoever gets him is getting a big weapon. Every down, every other down, every three downs...whatever.


So is Shepard and he is supposed to be able to throw as well...

If you can't utilize RS properly...how is LS going to help? He isn't....

Maybe it's the scheme...
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87027 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 9:00 pm to
It's our style of offense really.

Clusterfrick/WTF offense just doesn't seem to be working.
Posted by German Shepard
Berlin, Germany
Member since Jan 2009
1063 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

Maybe it's the scheme...


"Maybe" is being kind.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25557 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 9:09 pm to
2 years ago...Crowton was king...

I'm beginning to think it's because of who you have at QB....JJ is a great athlete...QB...well I think LSU could do better...

Maybe this Lee kid will be the answer, if he makes it to campus...From an outside perspective, it doesn't look like RS will be the answer either...
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87027 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 9:16 pm to
I think it has more to do with what our previous QB coach did with Flynn

Just look at what Dennis Dixon did the year after Crowton left. He nearly had a Heisman. He looked like shite under Crowton.

Crowton must go. We need an OC that can properly develop a QB.
Posted by Marines4Auburn
Auburn Alum in South Florida
Member since Sep 2009
14926 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 9:26 pm to
LSU is elite, they need to go get an elite OC. This bullshite with Crowton is embarrassing to the program.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25557 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Crowton must go. We need an OC that can properly develop a QB.


Why does the OC have to devlop a QB?

We have a QB coach that is not the OC, yet he has OC experience...

Our OC is actually the WR coach...

Is Crowton the QB coach too?
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87027 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

Is Crowton the QB coach too?


Unfortunatly.

But his offense is just too... what's the word...

"WTF was that shite"

Posted by ricker300
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2007
377 posts
Posted on 12/5/09 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Dyer vs. Seastrunk - who would you rather (for all schools)


not another Dyer vs Seastrunk thread
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram