- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
#1 class without a QB = ?
Posted on 1/18/16 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 1/18/16 at 2:42 pm
Is this going to be viewed as successful if we fail to lure a reasonable exciting QB to campus?
Isn't it well known that the QB is the most important position on the field?
Or, are people placing trust in the "one year more in the system' belief on Harris?
I sure hope we get Haskins, or some last minute surprise.
Isn't it well known that the QB is the most important position on the field?
Or, are people placing trust in the "one year more in the system' belief on Harris?
I sure hope we get Haskins, or some last minute surprise.
4
Posted on 1/18/16 at 2:43 pm to TigerBert
Melt regardless
Posted on 1/18/16 at 2:46 pm to TigerBert
quote:Are you seriously placing trust in having a true freshman start and do something of substance in the SEC?
Or, are people placing trust in the "one year more in the system' belief on Harris?
And to answer your question sure it would be a little disappointing only from the fact that it is nice to have a steady stream of QB's coming into the program to hedge against having to ever play a young QB. However, the class would still be stacked with talent and would only make signing at least 1 QB next season a absolute must.
So in conclusion yes class would be a success, but would place more onus on next year's QB recruiting.
This post was edited on 1/18/16 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 1/18/16 at 2:49 pm to TigerBert
Etling and presumably the kid from Tulane are enough for this team next year. Screwed up that they didn't get Russo when they could have.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 2:49 pm to TigerBert
quote:Hell yeah
Is this going to be viewed as successful if we fail to lure a reasonable exciting QB to campus?
quote:No. You may be the 1st to come to this conclusion.
Isn't it well known that the QB is the most important position on the field?
quote:Yeah, how dumb of people to believe that a QB will improve from his Sophomore to Junior year. We should defiantly trust in a true Freshman quarterback.
Or, are people placing trust in the "one year more in the system' belief on Harris?
This post was edited on 1/18/16 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 1/18/16 at 2:50 pm to TNTigerman
quote:Depth.
Etling and presumably the kid from Tulane are enough for this team next year.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 2:54 pm to Solo Cam
[/quote]
That's what I mean. Harris, then three back ups, preferably in this order: Etling, Jennings, and Tulane kid. If you get past the third QB, it doesn't matter anyway - even if Urban Meyer were coaching our QB's.
quote:
Etling and presumably the kid from Tulane are enough for this team next year.
quote:
Depth.
That's what I mean. Harris, then three back ups, preferably in this order: Etling, Jennings, and Tulane kid. If you get past the third QB, it doesn't matter anyway - even if Urban Meyer were coaching our QB's.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 3:02 pm to TNTigerman
The Tigers still have Justin McMillan as well, so depth is on the roster.
Posted on 1/18/16 at 3:06 pm to 225rumpshaker
quote:
The Tigers still have Justin McMillan as well, so depth is on the roster.
Oh yeah. Forgot him. Thanks.
Let him and Jennings fight it out for 3rd string
Posted on 1/19/16 at 8:05 am to TNTigerman
we don't need a qb in this class.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News