- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

post quality review for kashonly
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:14 pm to Carson123987
He's harmless. Do not support.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:14 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
if walt got banned for poor post quality, then kashonly should be permabanned for his
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:15 pm to Carson123987
I'll trade Kashonly for Walt any day of the week and twice on Wednesdays.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:18 pm to Rickety Cricket
i miss him. fred said that he is now posting as tunechi

This post was edited on 10/18/13 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:21 pm to Carson123987
If poor post quality can get you banned, how is KevinGates still posting?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:23 pm to Carson123987
quote:
if walt got banned for poor post quality,
I don't see what one poster's banning has anything to do with another poster's post quality review.
"Oh, this guy made me laugh but got banned so anyone who doesn't entertain me enough should be considered for banning as well."
Don't get me wrong, Kash sucks sometimes but that's no grounds for suspension IMO.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:26 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
"Oh, this guy made me laugh but got banned so anyone who doesn't entertain me enough should be considered for banning as well."
what? not what im saying at all.
Walt's post quality is far better than kash's, so if walt got banned for his poor quality, than kash should be as well.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:27 pm to Carson123987
quote:
Walt's post quality is far better than kash's,
What made Walt's post quality better or worse than Kash's?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:28 pm to Carson123987
was it ever specified why W was banned?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:29 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
HeadyBrosevelt is worse than both the ones you guys are arguing about, mon.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:29 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
kash starts these dumbass threads daily and gets blasted for every one.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:30 pm to Carson123987
quote:
kash starts these dumbass threads daily and gets blasted for every one.
So does Heady but you love him.

Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:30 pm to Kafka
quote:
If poor post quality can get you banned, how is KevinGates still posting?
Baloo is a closet Drake fan
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:31 pm to Mr. Tom Morrow
quote:
So does Heady but you love him.
woah woah woah. where did you get this
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:31 pm to Carson123987
Wait, do people really get banned for "post quality"? How is that even determined?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:31 pm to Carson123987
quote:apparently we disagree on the meaning of the word "specified"
because of his post quality
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:33 pm to Carson123987
quote:
kash starts these dumbass threads daily
Have you seen the threads Walt starts?

The only difference is Walt gets away with it because it's Walt.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:33 pm to Mr. Tom Morrow
quote:
Wait, do people really get banned for "post quality"? How is that even determined?
admins read their posts and determine if they're shitty enough to warrant a break
Popular
Back to top
