Started By
Message

How accurate are Apps like runkeeper when it comes to calories burned?

Posted on 7/29/17 at 10:56 pm
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 10:56 pm
I recently went on a hiking trip in Smokey Mountain National Park. I used runkeeper for a few of my day hikes.

Examples:

Day 2
6.3 Hours
8.7 Miles
1957 elevation gain
1921 calories burned

Day 4
3.2 Hours
4.9 Miles
1475 elevation gain
1246 calories burned

What do you think? Do the calories burned seem accurate?
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18758 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 11:35 pm to
It appears to be very inaccurate.

Are you just curious or trying to figure out how to log that?
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 7/29/17 at 11:56 pm to
So if you are saying that runkeeper is not accurate, can you explain how you know?


Yes, I would be interested in learning how to accurately gage how many calories I am burning based on time/distance/elevation gain.
This post was edited on 7/30/17 at 12:01 am
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18758 posts
Posted on 7/30/17 at 9:09 am to
Let's break down your numbers like this:

Day 2
Pace 1.3 mph
305 calories hour-1
221 calories mile -1

Day 4
Pace 1.5 mph
390 calories hour -1
254 calories mile -1

All things being the same, you would expect these numbers to be pretty much identical. Most calorie calculators just estimate calories burned based on the time or distance of your walk vs your body weight.

What's more interesting is that elevation gain would imply effort. The day you had a greater elevation gain, it says you burned less calories in an hour and less calories in a mile. However, it looks as if the app possibly factored in your pace, as you had a greater pace over the shorter distance. Therefore it likely assumes you more quickly burned calories based on pace even though you likely expended more energy tackling a greater elevation change.

I use my Garmin watch to track my exercise calories. It has a heart rate monitor built into the wrist strap, which I know is less accurate than a chest band. Yesterday I walked for 56 minutes at 207 lbs, and it says I burned 451 calories with an average heart rate of 111 beats minute -1. This number is also likely inaccurate. According to livestrong.com, I probably burned closer to 240 calories per hour. So, my point is that you should take these numbers with a grain of salt.
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 7/30/17 at 12:19 pm to
Thanks

I also forgot to mention that Day 2 included a 15 minute lunch. Day 4 had no break.

I was down about 8-9 lbs after the week.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram