- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LCD or Plasma for TV for gaming?
Posted on 12/12/11 at 9:52 am to Antiheroaz
Posted on 12/12/11 at 9:52 am to Antiheroaz
quote:
Oh and congrats on not being poor
well... it is a vizio

Posted on 12/12/11 at 10:13 am to kick2theface
Plasma Refresh rate is very misleading. 600hz my arse. Divide that by 5 and thats what you get. Yes, 120hz. Look it up. Plus, there arent even many games and such out there that even support higher refresh rates. Take a 120hz and be happy with it. As for "TV lag", There is a setting on most TVs that is made just for gaming. On my Samsung TV it is called "Game Mode"--completely fixed the problem.
FWIW, cable and sat only broadcast in 60hz.
FWIW, cable and sat only broadcast in 60hz.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 11:34 am to RougeTiger
I think argument needs to be more between LED and Plasma.
But yeah, I feel like LEDs seem to have the better lighting, are thinner, and use less energy.
Plasmas look good as well but have lighting issues, are bigger, and weight more, and use more energy.
But yeah, I feel like LEDs seem to have the better lighting, are thinner, and use less energy.
Plasmas look good as well but have lighting issues, are bigger, and weight more, and use more energy.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 11:35 am to Croacka
quote:
well... it is a vizio
Vizio is does cost less, but I've had good luck with mine. Pretty good picture quality too.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 11:37 am to Smash Mouth Tider
Visions actually have a really good picture.
I have two, a 37 and 42.
Some people have asked if my 42 was 3D
I have two, a 37 and 42.
Some people have asked if my 42 was 3D

Posted on 12/12/11 at 11:44 am to Smash Mouth Tider
quote:
Vizio is does cost less, but I've had good luck with mine. Pretty good picture quality too.
I had a vizio crap out in three years

I have three in another room now though. They rarely get used
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 11:46 am
Posted on 12/12/11 at 12:03 pm to Smash Mouth Tider
quote:
Check again.........LCD prices have really came down this year. You can get them under $400 all day long
Yea i bought that tv like 2 years ago. They really have come down quite a bit. I hate electronics

Posted on 12/12/11 at 12:20 pm to Antiheroaz
quote:
Poor-ish?
more like JEW-ish
Posted on 12/12/11 at 12:21 pm to MaroonDawg
Actually I bought the highest rated tv on cnet
It just happened to be a vizio
Full array led backlighting
It just happened to be a vizio
Full array led backlighting
Posted on 12/12/11 at 12:44 pm to Croacka
All I really care about is not having any lag. Dont really care about what models have a better picture quality. So basically I need something with a refresh rate of 120 hz?
Is there anything else that factors in? I have played on 60hz refresh rates before and it was pretty much unplayable.
Is there anything else that factors in? I have played on 60hz refresh rates before and it was pretty much unplayable.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 12:49 pm to hiltacular
Read my first post in this thread
Posted on 12/12/11 at 12:58 pm to hiltacular
quote:
All I really care about is not having any lag. Dont really care about what models have a better picture quality. So basically I need something with a refresh rate of 120 hz?
Yes. And go with a Samsung. I have one and like someone said, they have a "game mode" option on their TV that greatly helps.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 1:28 pm to kick2theface
I own both and I like the plasma better for gaming, seems a little more defined,
Back to top
