Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:08 pm to
Posted by MrPappagiorgio
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2009
41124 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:08 pm to
Is Buga a Tracey alter?

Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17722 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:43 pm to
The dude is frickin whack.
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34389 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:48 pm to
I will not be happy if this is vetoed
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I will not be happy if this is vetoed


it already happened. I don't think people are actually looking to what Barton and McCollum have been doing. Hey also severely undervaluing the flexibility of having them be able to range from pg/sg/sf. That's a lot of range and solid players at the weakest positions.

The one screaming at the top of his lungs for collusion just offered me a worse trade with parsons beal and rondo. That's an epic decline at the sf position, a very average sg with an injury and one very good player but I already have an above average pg and they have no flexibility being single position players. Horrible trade
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34389 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:29 pm to
COunt me out For next year. Both leagues
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:36 pm to
I don't see how it is remotely veto worthy but I defer to the leagues decision. I guess people going off name recognition. Post their boxes that show their previous games fantasy scores and remove their names the. evaluate the trade and I bet it looks a lot different
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34389 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:37 pm to
Its not veto worthy at all. I was actually hesitant to accept.

People are judging just off names
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
29855 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

People are judging just off names



Its bad because he traded for the players based on the uptick from production based on the players teams primary scorers being injured. The trade isnt fair at all imo. I will say though, Lillards injury will nag him all season probably.
I wouldnt veto though because its Fear that was involved and I know he isnt an idiot.
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
29855 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

And no one has offered anything better despite my numerous requests




I offered more than None did.
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:55 pm to
quote:



I offered more than None did.
I told you the melo and Tobias offer was good but I needed a sg too
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
82091 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:56 pm to
Why was the trade vetoed?
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Why was the trade vetoed?


because me and none were colluding
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34389 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:57 pm to
Its bullshite
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
29855 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:00 pm to
Lobos did you veto or CQQ?
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
82091 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:02 pm to
It wasn't fair at all, but vetoing is bullshite. It sets a terrible precedent (sp?).

And this is coming from the guy in 1st place with the person receiving Durant being in 2nd place. Vetos should never happen unless the two owners are colluding. Fear and None don't know each other
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 2:03 pm
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34389 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:07 pm to
Voice of reason
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
82091 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:09 pm to
No, I just know how to run a successful fantasy league. Nothing else
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:15 pm to
What's not fair about it? Is it the expectation of regression? On its face it looks like a decent trade which could have good upside. It's a gamble but with my team I have to do something
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:16 pm to
And I still havent seen anything better
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 2:16 pm
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17722 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:34 pm to
I'm not down with the veto either.
first pageprev pagePage 63 of 114Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram