- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:08 pm to Fearthehat0307
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:08 pm to Fearthehat0307
Is Buga a Tracey alter?
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:43 pm to MrPappagiorgio
The dude is frickin whack.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:48 pm to Gtothemoney
I will not be happy if this is vetoed
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:18 pm to Nonetheless
quote:it already happened. I don't think people are actually looking to what Barton and McCollum have been doing. Hey also severely undervaluing the flexibility of having them be able to range from pg/sg/sf. That's a lot of range and solid players at the weakest positions.
I will not be happy if this is vetoed
The one screaming at the top of his lungs for collusion just offered me a worse trade with parsons beal and rondo. That's an epic decline at the sf position, a very average sg with an injury and one very good player but I already have an above average pg and they have no flexibility being single position players. Horrible trade
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:29 pm to Fearthehat0307
COunt me out For next year. Both leagues
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:36 pm to Nonetheless
I don't see how it is remotely veto worthy but I defer to the leagues decision. I guess people going off name recognition. Post their boxes that show their previous games fantasy scores and remove their names the. evaluate the trade and I bet it looks a lot different
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:37 pm to Fearthehat0307
Its not veto worthy at all. I was actually hesitant to accept.
People are judging just off names
People are judging just off names
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:48 pm to Nonetheless
quote:
People are judging just off names
Its bad because he traded for the players based on the uptick from production based on the players teams primary scorers being injured. The trade isnt fair at all imo. I will say though, Lillards injury will nag him all season probably.
I wouldnt veto though because its Fear that was involved and I know he isnt an idiot.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:51 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
And no one has offered anything better despite my numerous requests
I offered more than None did.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:55 pm to dj30
quote:I told you the melo and Tobias offer was good but I needed a sg too
I offered more than None did.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:56 pm to Fearthehat0307
Why was the trade vetoed?
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:57 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:because me and none were colluding
Why was the trade vetoed?
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:00 pm to Nonetheless
Lobos did you veto or CQQ?
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:02 pm to Fearthehat0307
It wasn't fair at all, but vetoing is bullshite. It sets a terrible precedent (sp?).
And this is coming from the guy in 1st place with the person receiving Durant being in 2nd place. Vetos should never happen unless the two owners are colluding. Fear and None don't know each other
And this is coming from the guy in 1st place with the person receiving Durant being in 2nd place. Vetos should never happen unless the two owners are colluding. Fear and None don't know each other
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:09 pm to Nonetheless
No, I just know how to run a successful fantasy league. Nothing else 
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:15 pm to TigerTatorTots
What's not fair about it? Is it the expectation of regression? On its face it looks like a decent trade which could have good upside. It's a gamble but with my team I have to do something
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:16 pm to Fearthehat0307
And I still havent seen anything better
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 1/7/16 at 2:34 pm to Fearthehat0307
I'm not down with the veto either.
Popular
Back to top


1






