Started By
Message

re: TDBL Official Updated Keeper List

Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:05 am to
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:05 am to
bartlett and lackey for reyes idiot?
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:11 am to
quote:

bartlett and lackey for reyes idiot?


Awesome negotiation tactic.



ron, trade me zimmerman, frickhole.
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:13 am to
you got nan pieces


ETA: you realize hes a lot better than you thought huh?
This post was edited on 3/5/10 at 11:14 am
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138511 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:14 am to
Crawford for Zimmerman and a pick
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Crawford for Zimmerman and a pick



LOL


ou think crawford is > zimmerman?


LOL to the wall



redd, only way i would move zimmerman is a 2 for 2 where i get back youk and you upgrade me at ss or of
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:17 am to
quote:

ETA: you realize hes a lot better than you thought huh?

I don't really wanna trade for him, but I never thought Zimmerman sucked.


Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:18 am to
quote:

redd, only way i would move zimmerman is a 2 for 2 where i get back youk and you upgrade me at ss or of


Naw.
Youk plays 1B and 3B. I like him more than Zimmerman because of that. Zimmerman will prolly have better stats though.
Posted by geauxlsu07
Adirondack Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
35865 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:18 am to
quote:

where i get back youk and you upgrade me at ss or of


seems fair


Posted by geauxlsu07
Adirondack Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
35865 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:20 am to
quote:

ou think crawford is > zimmerman?


I do
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:23 am to
oh, well i would do any of these trades if you were interested

all with zimm and youk, plus

ibanez for quentin
bartlett for zobrist
mclouth for zobrist
ibanez for zobrist
bartlett/ibanez/mclouth for dunn


not sure if you really want to do any of them, but i would downgrade in 3b and yo upgrade me somewhere else
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Youk plays 1B and 3B. I like him more than Zimmerman because of that. Zimmerman will prolly have better stats though.




lol. you like him more bc he is eligible at two spots, even though you know zimm will put up better numbers?


and geaux, you just traded reyes bc you realize he sucks in our league, yet you think crawford is > zimm????




carl crawford is somewhere around 40 in offense in this league
Posted by geauxlsu07
Adirondack Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
35865 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:28 am to
quote:

you just traded reyes bc you realize he sucks in our league,


no I traded him because my team needed an upgrade and he had value...
quote:

yet you think crawford is > zimm


yes I do..I also think Youk is better
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:30 am to
quote:

lol. you like him more bc he is eligible at two spots, even though you know zimm will put up better numbers?

The difference in stat lines between the two is minimal, ron.

We are talking about the 4th best 3B vs. the 5th best 3B.
Youk is much better in OPS, and Zimmerman may beat Youk by only a couple in all of the other categories. So yeah, I value Youk more than Zimmerman.

Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:31 am to
quote:

carl crawford is somewhere around 40 in offense in this league

I have him at 74.
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:33 am to
you arent taking into account that that pussy youk will be injured at some point


zimm will be projected to have 70 more at bats than him this year. i weighted my ops rankings based on at bats, thus i have zimm ahead of him
Posted by geauxlsu07
Adirondack Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
35865 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:33 am to
quote:

I have him at 74.


still like him over Zimmerman..Crawford can be a week changer for a team..5 SBs in one game out of no where


Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:33 am to
quote:

I have him at 74.






llol
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:34 am to
youre reaching bro
Posted by geauxlsu07
Adirondack Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
35865 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:35 am to
quote:

youre reaching bro


yeah for my car keys to go back to my yob!!!!

ETA: I guess I've also proven I don't know what I'm doing
This post was edited on 3/5/10 at 11:36 am
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78195 posts
Posted on 3/5/10 at 11:35 am to
quote:

you arent taking into account that that pussy youk will be injured at some point


Yeah, cuz Zimmerman has never been injured either.


quote:

zimm will be projected to have 70 more at bats than him this year

And yet Youk is still on his level in terms of hr, r, and rbi, despite the lesser number of ABs.

Thanks for strengthening my argument.
first pageprev pagePage 56 of 168Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram