Started By
Message

re: TDBA Offseason

Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:22 am to
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72018 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:22 am to
We get to vote on a GP limit so it's whatever we want to propose

I imagine that adding a spot wasn't a concern to most bc that feel it's fine how it is and don't think it needs to go any further
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72018 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:24 am to
Biggest winner

Mason Plumlee

Could be a top 5 C
Posted by MrPappagiorgio
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2009
41122 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:24 am to
How many extra starts would that single UTIL spot netted you? 5ish?

Youre still outgamed by 7 and still streaming to get to 50...

50 is too damn high!
Posted by MattyV
New Orleans, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2009
2487 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:25 am to
Good Call. Forgot about that trade.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27421 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:26 am to
Add an additional UTIL, cut the games played down to 46.

That's what I was looking for, Papps.
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:29 am to
CJ McCollum stock takes flight with Aldridge gone as well. He's going to have some monster lines this year.
Posted by MattyV
New Orleans, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2009
2487 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:34 am to
Yeah especially if Matthews leaves also.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72018 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:34 am to
What's the reasoning there papz
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72018 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:35 am to
You're talking just getting more shots I assume
Posted by Toula
504
Member since Dec 2006
35399 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:43 am to
I'm okay with roster sizes. Would like one or two more, but not a deal breaker.

I just hate the days where I have 13 dudes that can start and can only play 10.
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:44 am to
Yea basically.
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:45 am to
But that's part of strategy, no? Determining match ups and who you think is the better start?
Posted by fratmonster
Member since Oct 2005
10942 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:48 am to
quote:

CJ McCollum stock takes flight with Aldridge gone as well. He's going to have some monster lines this year.



and Batum is gone
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27421 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:51 am to
quote:

But that's part of strategy, no? Determining match ups and who you think is the better start?


One additional UTIL spot wouldn't affect this.
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 10:52 am
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:00 am to
I'm not against an additional Util spot. I just think it's better to have nightly start limits. Jmo.
Posted by Toula
504
Member since Dec 2006
35399 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:05 am to
Not really. If you have 13 guys playing on Wed, and 2 playing in Thursday. You are basically forced to play both Thurs guys, even if they are you worst players.

You might have benched two better players the day before.

Expanding starting spots actually increases the lineup decisions that have to be made.
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:16 am to
My bad. I thought we were talking about adding Util at the expense of another slot. I could see eliminating the F spot and adding Util.
Posted by fratmonster
Member since Oct 2005
10942 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Not really. If you have 13 guys playing on Wed, and 2 playing in Thursday. You are basically forced to play both Thurs guys, even if they are you worst players.

You might have benched two better players the day before.

Expanding starting spots actually increases the lineup decisions that have to be made.




This
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72018 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:07 pm to
quote:


Expanding starting spots actually increases the lineup decisions that have to be made.



Not if it coincides w a smaller GP limit. It'll just frick you more bc you'll be making cuts somewhere

Lower the GP limit or add starting spots to help reach the current limit

Don't need both
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 12:09 pm
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:26 pm to
Agree.

The reason I'm against expanding roster spots is bc the waiver wire is trash now. I mean I find myself chasing blocks with people like the Lavoy frickin Allen type players. Chasing assists with Devin Harris. Lower game limits is the way to go.
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram