- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/9/18 at 10:03 am to Gtothemoney
I never got an offer from Frat. Harris is what I was looking for in a player.
I think Harris will be given SF eligibility but I like him better than Barton. Maybe not immediately but long term. I think he has all star potential.
quote:
And Harris is the 2nd best SG on his own team. The other also carries SF elig.
I think Harris will be given SF eligibility but I like him better than Barton. Maybe not immediately but long term. I think he has all star potential.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 10:12 am to PortCityTiger24
Mwg awfully chirpy since he’s risen from the doldrums.
I mean it’s championship or bust for all his boastfulness.
I’m not a contender, but I’ve got a couple younger guys I think are gonna take a nice step forward.
I mean it’s championship or bust for all his boastfulness.
I’m not a contender, but I’ve got a couple younger guys I think are gonna take a nice step forward.
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 10:16 am
Posted on 10/9/18 at 10:13 am to Gtothemoney
Yeah you've got pieces to work with.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 10:20 am to TthomasJR
No. I'm handing out facts.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 10:39 am to Gtothemoney
I'm siding with mwg so I can join chat pack
Posted on 10/9/18 at 11:15 am to Nonetheless
Smart man...you are gonna need a few chatpack deals to expedite your rebuild.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 11:59 am to MattyV
Elton Brand is now my placeholder for Allonzo Trier
Posted on 10/9/18 at 12:58 pm to TthomasJR
Guys,
We changed to FAAB this year. In the past if someone wanted someone who wasn't in the player pool, they would alert the commish to have him added and would hold a retired player in place. Do you think with FAAB that the player should be bid on when entering the pool? I am not a league nazi, so this shouldn't be my call. What does the league think?
We changed to FAAB this year. In the past if someone wanted someone who wasn't in the player pool, they would alert the commish to have him added and would hold a retired player in place. Do you think with FAAB that the player should be bid on when entering the pool? I am not a league nazi, so this shouldn't be my call. What does the league think?
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:07 pm to PortCityTiger24
I agree with you Port that since we have moved to FAAB we have to let that play out. I don't want Trier, but whoever adds him should have to bid on him like any other player. I agree it's not ideal, but it's the most fair solution imo.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:08 pm to PortCityTiger24
I think if the player isn't in the pool, and the commish gets two emails about said player, then it should be awarded to the player who bid more.
My guess with Trier is no one else put in a bid, therefore I am awarded him for 0 FAAB dollars (I didn't add a bid amount). If someone else would have sent you an email or message placing a claim for $1, then he would go to that person.
My guess with Trier is no one else put in a bid, therefore I am awarded him for 0 FAAB dollars (I didn't add a bid amount). If someone else would have sent you an email or message placing a claim for $1, then he would go to that person.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:10 pm to TthomasJR
My reasoning is because we have no clue when ESPN is going to add players. We do not get alerts or updates from the site saying certain players are now available. I'd rather not have to check the player pool every single day waiting for ESPN to add the player.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:25 pm to TthomasJR
I agree with you on that, but you are asking the commissioner to keep track of that on top of all the bitching and moaning that takes place in this league. I'm not against your idea, but I'm not asking someone to take on that responsibility.
Also, what if the commish wants to bid on that player and planned on doing so when he gets an email for a claim with a bid amount. Do you see the issue with that?
Also, what if the commish wants to bid on that player and planned on doing so when he gets an email for a claim with a bid amount. Do you see the issue with that?
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:30 pm to MattyV
quote:
Also, what if the commish wants to bid on that player and planned on doing so when he gets an email for a claim with a bid amount. Do you see the issue with that?
I understand that as well. Toula has dealt with that for the past few years, not just because we added FAAB.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:39 pm to TthomasJR
So is that still your proposal even if it puts the commissioner at a disadvantage? Not sure if you were saying since Toula dealt with it someone else should be ok with it.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:42 pm to MattyV
Not making a proposal, just stating that Toula has done this every year since the beginning.
We are saying it should be different because of FAAB, but in reality, that shouldn't change anything.
We are saying it should be different because of FAAB, but in reality, that shouldn't change anything.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:48 pm to MattyV
quote:
Also, what if the commish wants to bid on that player and planned on doing so when he gets an email for a claim with a bid amount.
I wasn't going to say this, but that's my issue as well. The first time Tom mentioned him, he wasn't reeally on my radar. Sunday I had him as a potential add after Tom dropped Marshawn Brooks (his placeholder) to get Ariza, but Tom IMed me yesterday saying he wanted to claim him again.
IMO the player should be in the pool and bid on. Just like Tom got Ariza when many didn't know he was available, that stuff is going to happen.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:51 pm to TthomasJR
Fair enough. Now that we have FAAB and you can bid on players I think it makes the most sense to wait for the player to become available in the pool and then anyone who wants him can bid on him. Like I said it's not ideal, but I don't think Toula or Port or anyone else should have to handle these requests.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:53 pm to MattyV
OKay, I'm okay with this IF I still get Trier 
Posted on 10/9/18 at 1:55 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Sunday I had him as a potential add after Tom dropped Marshawn Brooks (his placeholder) to get Ariza, but Tom IMed me yesterday saying he wanted to claim him again.
Nothing stopped you from making the claim Monday morning. If no one else claimed him, you had every right to make the claim (as commish with the rules that were in place).
Page 44 of 156
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News