- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SECr FF Week 11 Playoff Crunch
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:00 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:00 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
I've got about 8 points I left on the bench by not starting Rivers and Gonzalez. I will be ill if I lose by that or less.
1
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:02 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Also gonna suck if Tulanians could win had he managed his team, as Moose is in 4th with the same record.
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:08 pm to Alahunter
I'm gonna ride the Dalton/Roethlisberger train the rest of the year...Matt is done for me. Maybe he'll do better for duece.
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:08 pm to Alahunter
Well. I'm done playing and have an 18.44 point lead. He has Demaryius Thomas and Amendola left to play.
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:15 pm to Alahunter
Be close. I'm up 53 and he's got Kap left.
This post was edited on 11/24/13 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:19 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Needed you to win. I play him next week.
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:30 pm to Duke
Has anyone else had any negative point players this year? I thought I had corrected that but apparently not. I thought I had changed the setting where a person would just go to zero but even if they had a negative point value it wouldn't be subtracted. I did it specifically for defenses getting negative values since it happens to them more than anyone else. I simply don't like that a player has the ability to hurt your score worse than simply not getting any points My belief is that zero is punishment enough for a bad play. Negative values add nothing to the overall gameplay or how the games turn out.
The weird thing about the bears today is that earlier they had a td listed on their score and yet it is not on there now. I don't know what happened to it. I guess it got reversed? At any rate, has anyone else had a negative value for a player this year?
The weird thing about the bears today is that earlier they had a td listed on their score and yet it is not on there now. I don't know what happened to it. I guess it got reversed? At any rate, has anyone else had a negative value for a player this year?
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:34 pm to tuck
I have a -3 from KC right now 
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:40 pm to tduecen
I may lose to Tulane and he didn't even start a DEF or K
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:41 pm to tuck
I can't recall seeing any negatives after all games have played.
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:46 pm to AubieALUMdvm
I just added a DEF and a kicker
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:48 pm to Alahunter
Any chance of Decker/Gronk out scoring Moreno by 40?
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:51 pm to tduecen
I seriously hate that but since the change did not register apparently there is nothing I can do at this point. I just hate that there is really no way, other than contacting nfl.com/fantasy support (good luck with that), to fix this. Surely I've mentioned this before. I've been known to go on long diatribes about my hatred for the negative fantasy player values. I have no problem with taking the player to zero for bad play, but I can't think of one good reason why negative numbers should be a part of the final score of the game. In the same way football scores cannot go below zero, why should fantasy scores? Zero is the absolute lowest number that exists in football scoring.
I certainly can understand the other side's argument but this is almost an argument simply about personal preferences. There is no objective right answer (although I think my argument is closest to being objective)
As far as doing anything about it this year, I don't see a fair way to make it happen. We're too far in now and I'm sure it's happened to someone's defense already. We all just have to keep going the way it is. I'll try to make sure this is taken care of next year. I'm not sure what I could do differently to make sure it doesnt occur, but perhaps I can get some assistance from Support staff about how to change that.
I certainly can understand the other side's argument but this is almost an argument simply about personal preferences. There is no objective right answer (although I think my argument is closest to being objective
) As far as doing anything about it this year, I don't see a fair way to make it happen. We're too far in now and I'm sure it's happened to someone's defense already. We all just have to keep going the way it is. I'll try to make sure this is taken care of next year. I'm not sure what I could do differently to make sure it doesnt occur, but perhaps I can get some assistance from Support staff about how to change that.
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:53 pm to tuck
Unless you can change Gordon from a 33 to a 13 I don't think the -3 is going to be the difference
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:53 pm to tduecen
quote:lol you gonna lose
tduecen
Posted on 11/24/13 at 6:58 pm to Fearthehat0307
It happens when you go against a player scoring almost 40 usually
Posted on 11/24/13 at 7:24 pm to tduecen
quote:you shouldn't suck at D so bad
It happens when you go against a player scoring almost 40 usually
Posted on 11/24/13 at 7:25 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
I just added a DEF and a kicker
Is this b/c i brought it up or did you already see it?
Posted on 11/24/13 at 7:25 pm to AubieALUMdvm
He did it when we played, left the spot empty until a few hours before the game
Posted on 11/24/13 at 7:42 pm to AubieALUMdvm
Because you brought it up. And my last second D just got a fumble returned for a TD
Page 85 of 103
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News