- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hornets Talk Fantasy Football LEAGUE 1 (Everyone paid-Ready to go)
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:51 am to Fearthehat0307
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:51 am to Fearthehat0307
AJ Green > Harvin
...i also offered you steve smith. i know you don't like him, but he was a top receiver last season and has 400 yards this year.
Reggie was a 4th round pick in PPR, and has been pretty good.
2 starters for 1 one can help a team in some instances, even if the 1 is the best player in the deal
....yahoo says you win in that trade by 57 points.
...i also offered you steve smith. i know you don't like him, but he was a top receiver last season and has 400 yards this year.
Reggie was a 4th round pick in PPR, and has been pretty good.
2 starters for 1 one can help a team in some instances, even if the 1 is the best player in the deal
....yahoo says you win in that trade by 57 points.
This post was edited on 10/17/12 at 9:56 am
1
Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:03 am to drake20
quote:15 point differential over 6 games averages about 2.5 points per game. so why is aj green untradeable but harvin isnt?
AJ Green > Harvin
quote:reggie has 6 points more than frank gore this year so far my worst rb.
Reggie was a 4th round pick in PPR, and has been pretty good.
quote:acquiring reggie would move gore to the bench so the increase in production i would be receiving would only be if reggie outscores gore by a bigger margin than harvin outscores whatever wr you would give me. going off what they have done so far i would be worse off each week
2 starters for 1 one can help a team in some instances, even if the 1 is the best player in the deal
Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:12 am to Fearthehat0307
i don't disagree with anything you have said...i don't think green or harvin are untradeable. It's just a matter of what me or you want for them. you don't want reggie and steve, i don't want charles. that's fine. their production has been pretty close. that's why i only used one of these >. 
as far as your roster...i didn't/haven't analyzed it like you have, so the trade might not make sense for you...but again, in some situations a 2 for 1 trade can help both teams, imo, and i don't think it's a el oh el trade. It's definitely a declinable trade. I just don't get the el oh el for smith/bush for harvin or not wanting to trade Green for Charles. Charles is great, but KC is constantly behind, and we both know what that does for RBs.
it's the 36th and 40th pick for the 47th pick
as far as your roster...i didn't/haven't analyzed it like you have, so the trade might not make sense for you...but again, in some situations a 2 for 1 trade can help both teams, imo, and i don't think it's a el oh el trade. It's definitely a declinable trade. I just don't get the el oh el for smith/bush for harvin or not wanting to trade Green for Charles. Charles is great, but KC is constantly behind, and we both know what that does for RBs.
it's the 36th and 40th pick for the 47th pick
This post was edited on 10/17/12 at 10:15 am
Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:21 am to drake20
quote:i wasnt el oh eling our trade. i was el oh eling the fact that you wanted me to give up harvin but then turn around in another trade and tell that person aj green is untradeable when they have almost similar production. i thought it was an el oh el moment
i don't think it's a el oh el trade
This post was edited on 10/17/12 at 10:22 am
Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:23 am to drake20
quote:same argument i made earlier to mrwiseguy.
Charles is great, but KC is constantly behind, and we both know what that does for RBs.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:28 am to Fearthehat0307
i got you...and what i'm saying is I wouldn't trade Green for Charles, but i might trade Green for Charles and Steve Smith or another WR if my team was in need of starters/WRs.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:28 am to Fearthehat0307
Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:31 am to drake20
Green and Charles were drafted 21st and 29th....not making a point. Yahoo has done a really nice job with their fantasy setup.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 11:34 am to drake20
Not trying to start a holy war here.
But in a re-draft today, Charles would absolutely go top 5 and possibly top 3.
I'm not going to make any other argument on the matter.
But in a re-draft today, Charles would absolutely go top 5 and possibly top 3.
I'm not going to make any other argument on the matter.
This post was edited on 10/17/12 at 11:35 am
Posted on 10/17/12 at 11:41 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:
Not trying to start a holy war here.
But in a re-draft today, Charles would absolutely go top 5 and possibly top 3.
Charles would go higher for sure, but idk about top 5...also, i enjoy the wars and the trade talks.
He's 20th in scoring amongst offensive players without a bye week. Green is 2nd.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 11:55 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:i dont think so but thats just my opinion. a lot of his so called worth comes from his 44 pts against the saints and i think we can all agree he will not play another run d that porous maybe for the rest of his career
Charles would absolutely go top 5 and possibly top 3.
This post was edited on 10/17/12 at 11:56 am
Posted on 10/17/12 at 12:40 pm to drake20
Kendall Wright and Josh Gordon gonna be some nice trade pieces soon
Posted on 10/17/12 at 2:56 pm to drake20
got a trade done with ice cold
Posted on 10/17/12 at 3:31 pm to drake20
quote:veto
got a trade done with ice cold
Posted on 10/17/12 at 3:32 pm to Fearthehat0307
Veto
Posted on 10/17/12 at 3:36 pm to drake20
fair trade
Posted on 10/17/12 at 3:43 pm to drake20
quote:trade rape
fair trade
Posted on 10/17/12 at 3:49 pm to Fearthehat0307
Within the rules. Not collusion. Similar points. Either player could have a better rest of the year
Posted on 10/17/12 at 3:51 pm to drake20
Collusion
Veto
You
Banned
Veto
You
Banned
Posted on 10/17/12 at 4:28 pm to tigerNation09
quote:this
Collusion
Veto
You
Banned
Page 114 of 144
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News