re: Fantasy football dynasty start up league

quote:

---

Nonetheless

---

What are you thinking for roster sizes and how many of each positions to start?

If it's a 12 team league then roster sizes need to be a minimum of 25-30 players. If 14 then 20-25. I think I would set it at 27 and 23. Also have 2 IR spots. You need space to be able to stash players and wait on development.

I'll also reiterate that I'm only really interested if this league ends up being super flex. Hope that's something y'all are interested in.

Super flex is qb as flex right?

Yeah, it's a flex spot that includes being able to start qb. It's essentially 2 qb because you wouldn't want to put anything else in that slot because of how much qb's score, but it gives you week to week flexibility with injuries and byes and such.

As is in 1 qb leagues qb doesn't have very much positional value. If you have one of the one or two elites in a given year it's nice, but really any other qb1's are pretty much interchangeable. Superflex returns value to the position and makes qb's comparably as valuable as rb's.

I've just been reading a lot about it on other dynasty forums, and I think it's an interesting way to go. And my other dynasty league is 1 qb, so I'd like to vary it some.

I'd just do:

QB
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
F
F
SF

Edit: Yours would be 4 QB spots. You only need to add one QB spot. With four it makes QB the only position that matters and many teams wouldn't be able to even fill a legal roster week to week.

Would it be one or two super flex spots? One right?

Yeah 4 would be too many. 2 I'm good with for sure

QB
Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
Flex (rb,wr,te)
Flex (rb,wr,te)

What's the argument for it being just a QB slot rather than one super flex? I think it just makes it a non trivial possibility that due to injury or bye that you aren't able to fill a legal roster one week and close to guarantees a loss. I think you should be able to fill that slot with someone in those situations.

I agree with super flex.