re: Cordarrelle Patterson owners

quote:

---

so they may be inclined to give him a rest if the Pack get up early

---

this is my line of thinking. Mckinnon gets touches no matter the scenario. I don't see Minnesota bombing it out desperately while so think at qb. the coach has a young squad and they've already exceeded expectations if you ask me.

If it's competitive, it will be because they're hammering GB on the ground and they'll continue to do it. Mckinnon gets carries in that scenario

If the Vikings are blowing them out, who fricking knows it could happen, then McKinnon will see a shitload of carries.

either way. I want 10 carries from McKinnon and I prefer that greatly to the 15 I expect from lacy. You couldn't imagine a better setup for him last weak and he sucked. Ball, ok I get it, he plays in a great situation, but then I'm banking on him bucking the trend of every rb getting smothered by the cardinals D...how is that different from plugging in McKinnon and hoping for the best. There are huge yards to be had on the ground against the green bay defense, McKinnon is clearly the most gifted of the 3 and pass protecting aside, I can't see norv turner (a RB guru) not giving him some good opportunities.

making the smart, sensible well reasoned decision every week is killing me at RB, I would be fine leaving points on the bench by sitting lacy. My instinct tells me to put in McKinnon, and I can't leave those points on my bench. Who cares? they'll have a combined 80 yards and a TD probably