Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Nickell Robey-Coleman gets another fine for illegal hit

Posted on 2/9/19 at 5:15 pm
Posted by Mrwhodat
Member since Dec 2015
10296 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 5:15 pm
February 9, 2019, 5:59 PM EST
pft

quote:

The playoffs became an expensive proposition for Rams cornerback Nickell Robey-Coleman.

He ended the postseason with significant fines in consecutive games for applying illegal hits to defenseless receivers.

The NFL has announced, via its in-house media conglomerate, that Robey-Coleman was fined $26,739 for a helmet-to-helmet hit on Patriots running back Rex Burkhead early in Super Bowl LIII. Robey-Coleman drew a flag for the hit.

In the NFC title game, Robey-Coleman avoided, if you haven’t heard, a penalty for unnecessary roughness for a helmet-to-helmet hit on Saints receiver Tommylee Lewis.

Robey-Coleman also avoided a flag for pass interference, making the outcome one of the most controversial postseason finish in years, applying an asterisk to the Rams’ Super Bowl berth and causing much of New Orleans to shun the Super Bowl.

But Robey-Coleman was fined for the hit on Lewis, running the total price for a pair of illegal hits to more than $53,000.

Posted by MSTiger33
Member since Oct 2007
20384 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 5:20 pm to
Now imagine if he pulled out a cell phone after those hits. Minimum 3 game suspension
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Regret nothing that made you smile
Member since Oct 2005
13349 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 5:35 pm to
The difference? One happened against the Saints, the other against the Patriots. So one went flagged, the other did not
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79684 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

The NFL has announced, via its in-house media conglomerate, that Robey-Coleman was fined $26,739 for a helmet-to-helmet hit on Patriots running back Rex Burkhead early in Super Bowl LIII. Robey-Coleman drew a flag for the hit.



Same amount he was fined for the hit on TLL.

That fine should be cumulative for multiple offenses. And in cases like NRC, the player should be suspended uhtil he demonstrates the ability to properly fricking tackle a ball carrier.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27875 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

the player should be suspended uhtil he demonstrates the ability to properly fricking tackle a ball carrier.
Posted by Mrwhodat
Member since Dec 2015
10296 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

The difference? One happened against the Saints, the other against the Patriots. So one went flagged, the other did not


Exactly. Brady gets an automatic first, milks the clock, and game winning kick. Circle jerk commences and his legacy is padded again.
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
65955 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 5:56 pm to
If he continues to do it, then yes.. he should be suspended. Especially in back to back games..
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27875 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 6:01 pm to
And how are you going to enforce that? Send a league rep to the guy’s home to make him demonstrate how to tackle on a dummy?

I’m not arguing a potential suspension. I’m laughing at the thought of a guy being suspended unless and until he can demonstrate that he knows how to tackle properly. That’s silly and impractical.
This post was edited on 2/9/19 at 6:06 pm
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
89924 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 6:08 pm to
I’d like to give him an illegal hit with a baseball bat.
Posted by tigerstripes
Loranger, LA
Member since Aug 2006
792 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 7:20 pm to
Maybe a legal hit in the quarter near Canal Street with the bumper of my truck.
Posted by canyon
Member since Dec 2003
18380 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 8:04 pm to
Clearly can't learn from the "shite, that burned" school of thought.
Posted by ScaryClown
Member since Nov 2016
5847 posts
Posted on 2/9/19 at 8:23 pm to
That call in the super bowl was horseshite. Can’t believe he was fined for that and was an even more agregious call on the field. Now what he did to the saints was out of line and unacceptable... seems like the nfl is trying to make up for it.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 2/10/19 at 9:46 am to
He hit a receiver who hadn’t had a chance to become a runner yet, with a helmet to helmet hit. What is “agregious” about that call? Seems textbook to me...?
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
10328 posts
Posted on 2/10/19 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

That fine should be cumulative for multiple offenses. And in cases like NRC, the player should be suspended uhtil he demonstrates the ability to properly fricking tackle a ball carrier.


I'm ok with this...he can practice on Goodell.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram