Started By
Message

re: The civil suits on the Baldwin shooting are going to be EPIC!

Posted on 10/23/21 at 11:37 am to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72422 posts
Posted on 10/23/21 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I don't think it's impractical to have people who use firearms on a set to understand basic safety, this is a requirement in every other profession. This is what Scruffy alluded to earlier, it seems the acting profession is the only one where the shooter is excluded from any safety considerations.

I'm not sure why that's being controversial here.

Exactly.

Someone alluded to the medical profession earlier.

They don’t decrease the number of people involved to improve outcomes in medical care.

They add people.

More eyes equals less chances that something is missed.

Why is that the opposite with acting? That makes zero sense to me.

This whole idea of “well, we don’t want the actor touching it because they could mess with it” is asinine.
This post was edited on 10/23/21 at 11:43 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263354 posts
Posted on 10/23/21 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

They don’t decrease the number of people involved to improve outcomes in medical care.

They add people.

More eyes equals less chances that something is missed.


Yep, a simple glance.

I'm actually shocked some dumbassses here think it's totally impossible for an actor to be able to determine a blank from a live round in a few seconds.

In every other profession, its the shooters responsibility to know what is in the firearm before pulling the trigger. Relying an some marginal prop people is no excuse, nor is it rational.
This post was edited on 10/23/21 at 12:40 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram