Started By
Message

re: What happened to the up tempo offense

Posted on 9/26/21 at 10:33 am to
Posted by IndianInBR
L'auberge
Member since Dec 2015
3272 posts
Posted on 9/26/21 at 10:33 am to
uptempo would not have worked, because that means giving State offense more opportunities. We needed to control the clock and we were effective till the fourth quarter when it sort of unraveled
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23486 posts
Posted on 9/26/21 at 10:40 am to
quote:

uptempo would not have worked, because that means giving State offense more opportunities. We needed to control the clock and we were effective till the fourth quarter when it sort of unraveled



This is conventional thinking, but when you don’t execute at a slower pace it just doesn’t work. Look at the disparity in TOP in this game and tell me how well the offensive pace worked for us? How would using tempo and maybe sustaining a couple of additional drives and scoring more points have been worse if we weren’t possessing the ball effectively playing slower?
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
19121 posts
Posted on 9/26/21 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

uptempo would not have worked, because that means giving State offense more opportunities. We needed to control the clock and we were effective till the fourth quarter when it sort of unraveled



Another issue is you have to keep drive going and not get behind the chains. Max was 62% completion yesterday and was about 60ish in first two games. Against CMU he was 75% completion rate. Look at how much different the offense looked in those two scenarios. That is the difference in sustaining drives and not...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram