Started By
Message

re: KEILANDS problem is Charles Scott

Posted on 9/15/08 at 6:20 pm to
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81266 posts
Posted on 9/15/08 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Ridely runs faster than Keiland


if by runs faster you mean runs slower than yes by all means he does


quote:

He hits the hole harder than Keiland. How can you not see this? If Keiland doesn't break it, he looks slow.


how can you not see that KW is a completely different kind of back then Scott or Ridley or Hester? He's not going to bust up the gut and grind out the tough yards every time. Big fricking shite. He can however, pop outside and go for 70 on any play, something Ridley can not.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59517 posts
Posted on 9/15/08 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

if by runs faster you mean runs slower than yes by all means he does



Keiland would win in a race without pads, but I'd say Ridley easily beats him to 5 yards past the line of scrimmage during a game. At least so far this season, which is all we have to go on.




quote:

how can you not see that KW is a completely different kind of back then Scott or Ridley or Hester?



He is, but I'm not sure why you're lumping Scott, Ridley, and Hester together.


quote:

He's not going to bust up the gut and grind out the tough yards every time. Big fricking shite.



It is big fricking shite. It's infinitely better to put our QBs in 2nd and 5 and 3rd and short, than 2nd and 3rd and long and cross our fingers that Keiland breaks one.


quote:

He can however, pop outside and go for 70 on any play, something Ridley can not.



Why are you so convinced Ridley can't break one? I have seen nothing to indicate that's the case.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram