re: 124 former military generals & admirals sign open letter warning against dire situation

Well, before we break them down, let’s consider the unassailable fact that the main stream media as well as the banking, university, and big tech industries have all gotten politically active and are unwavering in totalitarian support the Dem party. Therefore, pronouncements in OBiden’s EO’s take on a larger impact than the tailored language may otherwise suggest.

So the POTUS signed an EO that intervened and put a halt to the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. This measure had been considered by many state and federal administrative agencies. It had been halted in an abuse of power by the Obama Admin for political purposes. Trumps EO simply got the POTUS out of the political process. An international agreement was made with Canada and construction was well underway. Instead of letting the Congress debate the pros and cons of pipelines (which have majority popular support) OBiden signed an EO to stop the construction yet again, harming our international relationship with Canada and any other country who will now doubt the permanence of agreements which by their nature would span several administrations.

Biden signed an EO to enforce that transgenders cannot be barred from participation in any competition on a national level (think Olympics) or else funding would be withheld.
This highly controversial topic is the exact type of issue that should be considered and debated in a democratically elected representative body. It’s so radical, it’s popular support is less than 20% nationally. This OBiden EO will be lauded by the media and radicals in universities, and will have powerful echo effects beyond the limited legal power of the EO. It is an obvious example of the type of egregious abuse of constitutional principals, even if it legally has little impact.