- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for vax refusniks
Posted on 5/6/21 at 11:22 am to the808bass
Posted on 5/6/21 at 11:22 am to the808bass
Sorry for the typo. He had no proof that the deaths can be attributed to vaccines. He even said that it could be coincidence but that he was suspicious. Which he can say and feel; however, the agencies that advise American society have investigated and attributed no cause of death to the vaccines, save 1 death to JJ. I trust the scientists who work in these cases over Tucker’s assumptions but that’s just me.
1
Posted on 5/6/21 at 11:29 am to PentagonTiger
quote:
He had no proof that the deaths can be attributed to vaccines.
So, Tucker is counting vaccine deaths the same way the CDC is counting Covid deaths.
Note that in my original post about vaccine deaths, I didn’t say caused by the vaccine. I said vaccine related.
Comparing VAERS reports from this year to previous years reports on VAERS is a completely valid data point. Does it need more context and investigation? Sure. Is it a data point worth discussing? Sure. Why will no one have the discussion? If it was a pain med or a blood pressure med we would be having the discussion (and the drug would be under evaluation by the FDA and it might have a black box warning).
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News