Started By
Message

re: Why does society worship science, but ignore natural selection in the human race?

Posted on 5/4/21 at 7:44 pm to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72422 posts
Posted on 5/4/21 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Is now and always has been the engine that drives natural selection.

The definition of the word "fittest" is ever-changing, to make sense in terms of what characteristics of a mutated individual give them a significant advantage to survive and reproduce, while the rest of it's non-affected population fail and die away.

The mutation is completely unknown until it manifests, but when it does, and provides significant inheritable benefits, we see a shift in the concept of "fittest"

Eggheads claim NS is a moot point in terms of human evolution because of the artificial mutation called "wealth"

Malarke. Just a new definition of "mutation."
Besides, physical characteristics still matter, and influence our breeding... but again, fittest just doesn't mean what it used to.
Artificial insemination, fertility drugs, medical advances, nutrition improvements etc have altered our form and appearance more in the last 200 yrs than we have naturally over the previous millenia.

Regardless, natural selection is STILL the driving force.
This.

Natural selection still functions.

It just isn’t a readily visible event, like watching a TV show.

It is a generational event and the definition of “fittest” constantly changes.
This post was edited on 5/4/21 at 7:46 pm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36571 posts
Posted on 5/4/21 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

It is a generational event and the definition of “fittest” constantly changes.


Not in evolutionary biology. It almost singularly refers to reproductive success, without any addition of environmental qualifiers, and it doesn’t mean much else.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72422 posts
Posted on 5/4/21 at 8:00 pm to
Honestly, to counter Scruffy’s own opinion, natural selection may not even apply to humanity anymore.

We currently define the rules within our system.

Is it natural selection if one group of human was to eradicate another? Possibly, depending on how you define it.

It is interesting how each person applies the concept to humanity because there are multiple ways to view it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram