Started By
Message

re: A not too kind assessment of the F-35 program.

Posted on 2/24/21 at 2:33 pm to
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
16569 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

I know what you're getting at but the F-4 had major deficiencies in the fighter category

Absolutely. However I believe it was the only airframe that was in large quantities between AF, Navy, and USMC.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
25647 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Absolutely. However I believe it was the only airframe that was in large quantities between AF, Navy, and USMC.


That's correct.

However, as a counter point, it was a very good airframe. They continued to be in use up into the 1990's as a Wild Weasel and electronic warfare roles. That's almost 40 years in service.

Technically, they are still in service today as aerial drone targets designated as the FQ-4 (I think that's right)
This post was edited on 2/24/21 at 2:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram