- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A not too kind assessment of the F-35 program.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 2:33 pm to Lonnie Utah
Posted on 2/24/21 at 2:33 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
I know what you're getting at but the F-4 had major deficiencies in the fighter category
Absolutely. However I believe it was the only airframe that was in large quantities between AF, Navy, and USMC.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 2:39 pm to jcaz
quote:
Absolutely. However I believe it was the only airframe that was in large quantities between AF, Navy, and USMC.
That's correct.
However, as a counter point, it was a very good airframe. They continued to be in use up into the 1990's as a Wild Weasel and electronic warfare roles. That's almost 40 years in service.
Technically, they are still in service today as aerial drone targets designated as the FQ-4 (I think that's right)
This post was edited on 2/24/21 at 2:41 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News