re: Michael v McKnight (v Murphy?)

Answering the original post, Michael is thicker than both McKnight and Murphy and also shorter than both of them (although he and McKnight are probably near the same height).

All three are good receivers and Michael and McKnight each have a step on Murphy. That being said, Murphy could have a bigger sophomore season than McKnight. On paper, Murphy doesn't quite stack up to the other two but when you step on the field he does.

Murphy and Michael played in similar offensive schemes in high school while McKnight played in the veer. I think it says a lot for McKnight that he had a nice freshman campaign going straight from Louisiana "2A ball" (as it was put) to USC.