Started By
Message

re: If the Pennsylvania SOS said they weren't counting any white votes from the election?

Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:41 pm to
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
26178 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

I guess making "changes" is in the eye of the beholder and since no court would look at it because the law suit was brought "too late" or didn't have "standing"


Well, you are wrong. There is still a case pending with SCOTUS about a change that was made in the 11th hour in PA and those votes were never added to the tabulation. Now the court will likely choose not to hear the case since it is moot because the ballots would not change the outcome. This case was filed at the proper time, before the election and had moved through the courts. I am also concerned about the standing issues but cases like Texas v PA were doomed from their drafting and those drafting them should have known that, and likely did. The legal fight was helmed by and large by a group of ill prepared attorneys that failed in numerous ways.

quote:

there are millions of voters that feel disenfranchised.


Do they feel equally disenfranchised by the numerous red states like TX that also had governors, election boards and courts make changes to the election law? Again, if the legislatures had time to visit the changes by other entities (which occur routinely and not just in this election) the courts aren't going to give them a redo because they don't like the outcome.

The bottom line is filing suit over changes to the election law are almost always going to have to be filed BEFORE the election. You want to talk about disenfranchisement throwing out votes cast in accordance with the election procedures presented to voters at the time they vote is true disenfranchisement. You simply aren't going to be able to wait until after the election then file suit if you don't like the outcome. This was the vast majority of the suits.

The suits alleging fraud were horrible attempts, filed with poorly or non-vetted affidavits and claims from dubious experts. Don't think for a minute the courts didn't look through those proffers. People here also waved away the horrible syntax and spelling errors as if they didn't matter, on one hand they didn't but do you really think someone that files such an important case and misspells district in two different ways in two lines just naming the court also made sound legal arguments? Powell had to pray to the court to amend her pleadings because she said Dominion took votes from Biden and gave them to Trump. Shitty lawyering almost always produces shitty results.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram