Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS Rules 9-0 States Can Bind Faithless Electors

Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:29 am to
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Can Bind Faithless Electors


Word should be MUST or it means nothing.

Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66893 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Word should be MUST or it means nothing.


It means the states have the power to if they want.

I think General states have a lot of leeway in determining how their electors vote.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7541 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 11:08 am to
quote:

quote:
Can Bind Faithless Electors


Word should be MUST or it means nothing.



What would have been devastating is if SCOTUS would have said Faithless Voters can vote as the please and the State couldn't intervene.

This was a win for the Electoral College
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram