- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would law enforcement look without qualified immunity?
Posted on 6/20/20 at 10:52 am to Jack Bauers HnK
Posted on 6/20/20 at 10:52 am to Jack Bauers HnK
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 12:41 am
Posted on 6/20/20 at 10:53 am to efrad
quote:
quote:
Let’s turn the discussion into exactly what type of plaintiffs do we want recovering money from police departments? What actions are currently covered by QI that we want to become actionable?
Let’s start with the Fresno cops who stole $225,000
quote:
Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit Court decided that two police officers in Fresno, California, who allegedly stole more than $225,000 in assets while executing a search warrant, could not be sued over the incident. Though "the City Officers ought to have recognized that the alleged theft was morally wrong," the unanimous 9th Circuit panel said, the officers "did not have clear notice that it violated the Fourth Amendment."
Oh I’m sorry, was stealing illegal? We didn’t know.
The problem is not with QI. The problem is with how judges apply it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News