re: LSU Football Supports Social Justice Reform, BLM

quote:

---

quote:

---

Did you miss this in the post?

---

No. Your "post" in no way answers the question.

---

My post asked a simple question of the person I responded to, which was not you.

quote:

---

quote:

---

black men face a one in 1,000 risk of being killed during an encounter with police, a rate much higher than that of white men.

---

That's because blacks commit violent crimes at a higher rate than whites. Please review "victim data."
q

---

Provide a link to said victim data. Though I do know that is a correct to my understanding because I have looked at data in the past. That was not the question being asked, however. it was simply police encounters that was mentioned.

quote:

---

quote:

---

Black men and boys face the highest risk of being killed by police–at a rate of 96 out of 100,000 deaths. By comparison, white men and boys face a lower rate of 39 per 100,000 deaths, despite being a bigger portion of the U.S. population.

---

Again, your dishonesty is in full view. Blacks commit violent crime at higher rates than whites. See the "victim data" statistics to fully understand. You have probably seen these statistics and are choosing to ignore them. You are dishonest.

---

Explain how I am being dishonest? Are you not being intellectually dishonest by conflating violent crime statistics and police encounter statistics? Without providing data I might add.

I was simply answering the the question regarding police encounter data which the person he was responding to seemed to provide in my estimation. If you wish to rebut by providing data that could help modify the conclusion the poster had provided, by all means do so with you conclusions.