- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Sullivan asks judge to look at whether Flynn could be held in criminal contempt
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:02 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:02 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
that if the court intends to question the defendant under oath, on the record, and in the presence of counsel about the offense to which he/she has pleaded, that his/her answers may later be used against him/her in a prosecution for perjury or false statement.
So let me get this straight, a provision in place to hold a defendant accountable for lying to the court in his defense is being used to attempt a new prosecution of a defendant that the plaintiff admits was prosecuted in bad faith in the first place?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:05 pm to Turbeauxdog
Quickest way to end this is for Flynn to say he lied to the Court in his plea on advice of his counsel, who were colluding with a corrupt prosecution. He fricks them, and then he gets a pardon for a bullshite conviction.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:28 pm to Turbeauxdog
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News