re: chris paul nixed pels trade for curry and klay

quote:

---

He didn't have to say anything... he didn't have to say he wouldn't resign, all had to do was work the trade, and if he decided to leave after his contract was up just leave.

---

Oh my, that's adorable.

You think the Warriors would have traded for Paul without assurance that he would sign an extension.

C'mon man, that's a terrible take, and you know it.

quote:

---

Even if they asked him would he resign, all he had to say was that's something he hadn't thought about, and would see how things were when the time came, but to say "you can trade for me, but I'm not resigning" was a punk move, and he forced New Orleans hand with that weak Clippers trade.

---

Ah, so you would be 100% ok if a player that we traded for lied to us about extending, right? Yea, of course you wouldn't. There is no logic or consistency in anything you've said in that post.

Also, again that's a terrible take because GS was never ever ever ever ever going to make that trade without Paul agreeing to the extension. It's that simple.