Started By
Message

re: If you had to fight in WW2- Europe or Pacific

Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:20 pm to
Posted by mattfromnj
New Jersey
Member since Mar 2020
574 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:20 pm to
There were instances of Germans killing POWs too. The most notorious being the Canadians in Normandy and then a US unit in the Ardennes during Battle of the Bulge.

On the question overall I feel like it really depended on what unit you were in more than what front you fought in. The idea that a guy who was an infantryman at the Hurtgen Forest was somehow better off than a guy in the Pacific makes no sense. The fronts were both terrible it was just a matter of what unit you were in and what your job was.

does anyone have any relatives that weren't in the US military? There was a girl in law school from Germany whose grandfather had lost a leg at Stalingrad. He always told her it was the best thing that ever happened to him, to give you an idea of the level of suffering they were going through. Obviously they weren't on our side but I always thought hearing stories from them and the others in the east were really interesting.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98747 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

There were instances of Germans killing POWs too. The most notorious being the Canadians in Normandy and then a US unit in the Ardennes during Battle of the Bulge.


From my reading the act of surrendering/being captured was extremely dangerous, and you weren't guaranteed to survive it. Obviously worse in the Pacific, but that went for any side, anywhere. Once you got away from the front line, even if by just a few hundred yards, and into the custody of troops that hadn't been in close combat minutes before, your chances of living through captivity went up immensely.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16676 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

On the question overall I feel like it really depended on what unit you were in more than what front you fought in.


I already mentioned my one grandad who ended up a prisoner in the Pacific, but this was so true for my other grandad who was also in the Pacific. His unit was stationed on some island off the coast of New Zealand, and their only job was to protect a radio tower. He said most of his experience in the Pacific was shooting wild pigs and cooking them on the beach
Posted by MWP
Kingwood, TX via Monroe, LA
Member since Jul 2013
10511 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

The idea that a guy who was an infantryman at the Hurtgen Forest was somehow better off than a guy in the Pacific makes no sense. The fronts were both terrible it was just a matter of what unit you were in and what your job was.


I think every Grunt that gets to see combat whether it is present day deployments to Vietnam to Korea/WW II can attest that combat fricking sucks. However, seeing what the Marines had to endure in the Pacific theater gives a completely new meaning to the word terrible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram