Started By
Message

re: If you had to fight in WW2- Europe or Pacific

Posted on 4/7/20 at 2:57 pm to
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17630 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 2:57 pm to
Torn. People on here saying Europe because although it may be cooler (try living in below freezing for extended periods with inadequate cold weather gear) and because the Germans treated better (they did). But, I'd choose the Pacific Theater. Outside of the beginning of the war and Bataan, the Japs didn't take many prisoners. The fighting was just as brutal, but at least after the time on the island, you'd be rotated out for a bit, which was a lot more R&R/down time than those faced in Europe.


My ex-wife's Grandfather was captured at Kasserine Pass in North Africa in '43 and was held in Germany until the end of the war. Beaten/severe weight loss and he mentioned the damned cold a lot. Hated it. Thats why they moved to south FL after he returned.
This post was edited on 4/7/20 at 3:00 pm
Posted by MileHigh_Tiger
The penalty box
Member since Mar 2020
179 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:06 pm to
Interesting perspective. To me, hot and humid are more miserable than the deep winter cold, but I'm not going to pretend I'm not wearing adequate gear while exposed to the latter.

I built a wind project in the Adirondacks with lake effect snow hitting us for months. Although I was always well prepared with coveralls and whatnot, it was still miserable. Can't imagine being wet AND cold AND getting shot at, too.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram