Well could any organized jewish group get away with criticizing that though? Could they get away with saying "We don't like that blacks and asians were portrayed as nazi hunters, because they had absolutely nothing to do with it?"

How could they get away with that without it being taken waaaay out of context? In today's social climate, that shite doesn't roll.

And as far as your link is concerned, Rebecca Holt is an immigration judge, not a "nazi hunter". And David Shaw is an immigration and customs enforcement officer that works with war crimes of all kinds. He's not a "nazi hunter" in the classic definition either.

In fact, it was a jew (a justice department hunter of nazis) that actually prosecuted him.

Additionally, it was the germans that discovered him after a 1 in a billion chance when they raised a sunken german naval vessel that just happened to have his preserved personal information on it.

So no, "David Shaw and Rebecca Holt" aren't jewish and they had absolutely nothing to do with his identification.

LINK

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by Tiger Voodoo

Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!

Member since Mar 2007

21817 posts

Posted on 3/6/20 at 8:14 pm to Pandy Fackler

quote:
Additionally, it was the germans that discovered him after a 1 in a billion chance when they raised a sunken german naval vessel that just happened to have his preserved personal information on it.

Was the German that found it Jewish? If not, add Germans to the list of peoples willing to hunt, or at least turn in, Nazis

quote:
In fact, it was a jew (a justice department hunter of nazis) that actually prosecuted him.

Who gave him the assignment to hunt Nazis? Was that person Jewish?

quote:
And as far as your link is concerned, Rebecca Holt is an immigration judge, not a "nazi hunter". And David Shaw is an immigration and customs enforcement officer that works with war crimes of all kinds. He's not a "nazi hunter" in the classic definition either.

The link was actually kind of tongue in cheek, but it demonstrates the fallacy of your argument. Governments, agencies, and courts all over the world facilitated the hunting, deporting, and prosecution of Nazis.

As for the “classic definition” of Nazi hunters, again, Hunters doesn’t purport to portray that at all.

This is a rogue group intent on vengeance, not on bringing Nazis to justice in the classic sense, funded by a wealthy Holocaust survivor that has hired people that can most effectively carry out the job, not that necessarily feel the same personal stake that he does, although they certainly seem to relish their work.

Again, I’m not sure what is so hard to understand or accept about that