- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/23/20 at 2:54 pm to Oddibe
quote:
Can you let us know why this is an issue? Crowdstrike is a legitimate company but what kind of service did they provide for $225,000+?
1) Covering for a murder.
2) Framing Russians for a "hacking."
3) Jumpstarting the impeachment of GEOTUS
I think the DNC actually got a pretty good value from that $225k.
Posted on 1/23/20 at 2:58 pm to Oddibe
quote:
Crowdstrike is a legitimate company but what kind of service did they provide for $225,000+?
Incident Response from a company like CrowdStrike, FireEye, etc. isn't cheap.
There's a reason why cybersecurity folks are paid very well.
Posted on 1/23/20 at 2:58 pm to Oddibe
quote:
Crowdstrike is a legitimate company but what kind of service did they provide for $225,000+?
That's an outstanding question, and one that will be addressed in the relatively near future, I'd wager.
Posted on 1/23/20 at 3:05 pm to Oddibe
quote:
Can you let us know why this is an issue? Crowdstrike is a legitimate company but what kind of service did they provide for $225,000+?
I'm guessing because they were the ones that the DNC hired to examine its hardware and they're the ones that determined that it was the Russians who hacked. And the FBI took their word for it and they've never been challenged on it (and neither has the DNC) -- MSM is reporting it as an established fact
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News