Started By
Message

re: Worst Historical Disaster — Civil War or Second Great Awakening?

Posted on 12/21/19 at 8:42 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89808 posts
Posted on 12/21/19 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Wouldn’t we still have slavery though?



Of course not - on its own, slavery would have died as an institution no later than the 1880s or, perhaps, the 1890s. It was already becoming increasingly unfeasible, economically. Although the process was agonizingly slow, Southerners were losing their stomach for the obvious and undeniable (and horrific) abuse going on, particularly on larger holdings in the Cotton Belt.

Once cotton production was more mechanized, slavery simply wouldn't have been something affordable. Slaves had to be housed, clothed and fed from birth until working age, which was typically 12 to 14 and full production wouldn't have been expected until around 20. Middle aged slaves typically had fairly drastic decreases in production and had to, likewise, be housed, clothed and fed until death.

So, in addition to being an abject moral depravity, it would have become an unprofitable and unsustainable practice within 20 to 40 years after the Civil War anyway.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67800 posts
Posted on 12/21/19 at 9:23 am to
People say this but we still love cheap labor.

Using slaves for agriculture would have not been profitable after a while but factories?

Coal mining?

And I guess my point is that SOME KIND of abolitionist movement would have had to happen.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram