re: Vindman Admits Making up Parts of Trump Call Summary

quote:

---

“That’s not entirely accurate, but I’m not sure I would describe it as false, it was consistent with U.S. policy,” Vindman said.

Vindman said he included the rhetoric about corruption as a “messaging platform” to describe U.S. policy toward Ukraine, even though it was not discussed on the call.

---

Corruption was in the "talking points" outline that Vindman helped write for Trump for both his first and second phone call with Zelensky.

Trump didn't mention corruption in either call. And in fact, the "transcript" the White House gave out on the first phone call, said that Trump included the word corruption -- even though he didn't.

So, the fact that Vindman said that Trump said corruption in the second call -- was that good or bad for Trump?