Started By
Message

re: Meanwhile in San Francisco, the terms used to describe criminals are harmful and offensive

Posted on 8/22/19 at 8:58 am to
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
30981 posts
Posted on 8/22/19 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Actually, this is another piece of legislation under consideration of the California.
I could actually support this if it doesn’t apply to violent criminals.
quote:

Under a bill now making its way through the California State Legislature, millions of people in the state who have misdemeanor or lower-level felony records could be spared those problems: their criminal records would automatically be sealed from public view once they completed prison or jail sentences. The legislation would not apply to people convicted of committing the most serious crimes, like murder or rape.

“There are so many of us who just want to be better, but are constantly turned down, turned away,” said Mr. Jordan, who is now project director for Time Done, a program that is part of Californians for Safety and Justice, a nonprofit that advocates to make the criminal justice system less punitive.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
58408 posts
Posted on 8/22/19 at 10:34 am to
I don't. A person or business attempting to hire an individual who is best suited for a position has every right to know who they are hiring. A person's criminal record says as much about them and their character as anything else. Reputation matters for a reason. Should all criminal reords be weighed the same when considering who is best for a position? No. But, it is not the government's right to explicitly conceal those records when they could have a very real impact on the business as a whole.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram