Started By
Message

re: Andy McCarthy: Acosta’s sweetheart deal likely to foreclose Epstein’s SDNY prosecution

Posted on 7/15/19 at 1:15 pm to
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7298 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 1:15 pm to
My assumption from the first time I heard this break was that the feds were hoping to get new victims to come forward with new allegations to allow them to elide the double jeopardy problem altogether.
Posted by LSU2ALA
Member since Jul 2018
2017 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 3:14 pm to
The issue is his plea deal said he was getting a non-prosecution agreement for any offenses against the U.S. up until 2007. If there are new victims after that date, then I think he could be prosecuted. They also supposedly found child porn in his home. They could prosecute on that. The issue would be what right did they have to search his home. If they got a warrant based on something covered by his agreement, I’d guess there is a good chance the search warrant is not valid so the finding of the child porn is not valid.

I hope there are charges that are clearly not covered by the agreement as I want him in jail. I just don’t want to see the government getting hinkie with things and trying to get a second bite at the apple on the same charges. The right to prosecute is a powerful right. We don’t want the government to be able to expand it even if it’s in pursuit of a vile person such as this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram