- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS vacates $135K judgement against Oregon bakers
Posted on 6/18/19 at 2:24 pm to yatesdog38
Posted on 6/18/19 at 2:24 pm to yatesdog38
quote:The problem here is that Oregon has state laws that make gays a protected class, and the owners admitted they discriminated because the couple was gay
Also there should be some kind of Judicial review/punishment for the state level judge that made this ruling.
Take out either of those variables, and this case never exists
I guess the SC could deem the state law unconstitutional somehow, but they don't want to touch it
3
Posted on 6/18/19 at 2:28 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
The problem here is that Oregon has state laws that make gays a protected class, and the owners admitted they discriminated because the couple was gay
But the gays weren't discriminated against....
If I'm not mistaken, she didn't refuse to serve them because they were gay. She would happily make them a cake. Just not the cake they wanted. She would have made them a plain cake, would she not?
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 6/18/19 at 2:34 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
The problem here is that Oregon has state laws that make gays a protected class, and the owners admitted they discriminated because the couple was gay
This isn't true.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 2:59 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Oregon has state laws that make gays a protected class,
That's even worse.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News