Started By
Message

re: Breaking development in Roger Stone Case.

Posted on 6/17/19 at 4:34 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49050 posts
Posted on 6/17/19 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

don't see how evidence related to the origins of an investigation are relevant to charges of witness tampering.


That is not the standard. At all.

quote:

It's rock solid


Something no litigator has ever said. Good Lord.

quote:

solid -- he instructed someone to lie under oath, threatened him, etc

I doubt you know the elements/defenses etc. however, let’s assume you are correct. That has zero to do with evidentiary standards and procedures. Of which you clearly don’t care about. You just want your “side” to win.

It makes your inability to grasp a simple concept like “corrupt intent” all the more explainable. I was engaging you in good faith and honest debate. You are simply dishonest. This is now painfully clear.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:07 am to
quote:


That is not the standard. At all.



That's up for the judge to decide, no? There hasn't been a trial yet so this is the process working as intended.

quote:

Something no litigator has ever said. Good Lord.



Good thing I'm just watching the ballgame. What % of cases do you think the federal government loses? They don't typically litigate when they could lose.. in other words -- rock solid.

quote:

Of which you clearly don’t care about. You just want your “side” to win.


We both know he is guilty You just care more about the process than about justice -- I respect that because the process is important. I'd prefer to see the scumbag headed to spend the rest of his life in jail. Then I can chuckle when he gets his pardon.
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 7:08 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram