- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fletch 3: The Fletchening...Pels want Beal in 3 team trade
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:49 pm to Unknown_Poster
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:49 pm to Unknown_Poster
quote:Where has anyone said Tatum was a lock? I just think many think he is the best asset of those that have been rumored to be involved in a potential trade.
Exactly, the jury is still out on Tatum. I get why the Boston shill wants to hype Tatum, because he wants AD. What I don't get is why a lot of people here seem to think Tatum is some sure-fire lock.
3
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:51 pm to NOSHAU
I see him as having flashed as much or more potential than any other young piece mentioned in addition to having an extra year on his contract that Ingram doesn’t.
Will he be the best player out of any of the ones mentioned? Not necessarily. But he has a high floor, he fits a position of need, and we would have control over him for longer than his comparable number from the Lakers.
Will he be the best player out of any of the ones mentioned? Not necessarily. But he has a high floor, he fits a position of need, and we would have control over him for longer than his comparable number from the Lakers.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:51 pm to NOSHAU
Better than Beal? I get the Beal thing is a long-shot but my specific point in this thread is that Tatum is not a better asset than Beal.
In a vacuum, though, if you throw out an outlier like Beal then, yes, I agree that Tatum is the most valuable asset. But whether or not the package that includes him is better overall than the Lakers (or another team's) package is debatable.
And, yes, I've seen a decent number of people on here saying "I just want Tatum and be done with it." That logic is shortsighted.
In a vacuum, though, if you throw out an outlier like Beal then, yes, I agree that Tatum is the most valuable asset. But whether or not the package that includes him is better overall than the Lakers (or another team's) package is debatable.
And, yes, I've seen a decent number of people on here saying "I just want Tatum and be done with it." That logic is shortsighted.
This post was edited on 6/13/19 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 6/13/19 at 2:53 pm to NOSHAU
Very very good distinction. We have no idea how good Tatum will be, but even if he doesn’t become the next KD, he has a high floor. He’s a low risk/high reward guy
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News