- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's Talk About The Great Great Rafael Nadal
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:01 am to RedPants
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:01 am to RedPants
It is an incredible accomplishment by an incredible athlete and tennis professional. I am a Rafa fan, but more of a Fed fan. I think Fed's game is more elegant and pleasing to watch, but my youngest son who is 14 would tell you that Rafa's is more pleasing to watch, largely because it resembles his style of play.
If you compare any one accomplishment between the two players, I think Rafa's 12 RG titles trump Fed's 8 Wimbledon titles, but I don't think there is a gulf there (I'm alluding to a whole other discussion beyond the scope of this thread). If you want to expand that statement to say overall dominance on clay then there is a greater gap for certain compared to RF's dominance on any surface.
Overall career resume, I like Fed's, but the Rafa HTH dominance makes one give pause in that regard. Also 20 is not a huge advantage over 18, and Rafa has multiples on all surface, but excluding clay, Roger has higher order multiple wins in all the other slams - at least 5 at each of the other slams, which is truly extraordinary.
But comparing is probably completely what this thread is NOT about. So yes, his accomplishment in this regard is remarkable and the guy is truly a treasure to tennis and sport in general, and deserves recognition as such.
If you compare any one accomplishment between the two players, I think Rafa's 12 RG titles trump Fed's 8 Wimbledon titles, but I don't think there is a gulf there (I'm alluding to a whole other discussion beyond the scope of this thread). If you want to expand that statement to say overall dominance on clay then there is a greater gap for certain compared to RF's dominance on any surface.
Overall career resume, I like Fed's, but the Rafa HTH dominance makes one give pause in that regard. Also 20 is not a huge advantage over 18, and Rafa has multiples on all surface, but excluding clay, Roger has higher order multiple wins in all the other slams - at least 5 at each of the other slams, which is truly extraordinary.
But comparing is probably completely what this thread is NOT about. So yes, his accomplishment in this regard is remarkable and the guy is truly a treasure to tennis and sport in general, and deserves recognition as such.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 11:30 pm to BigPapiDoesItAgain
quote:
I think Fed's game is more elegant and pleasing to watch, but my youngest son who is 14 would tell you that Rafa's is more pleasing to watch, largely because it resembles his style of play.
Yeah, it's in the eye of the beholder. I don't like conclusive statements about how Federer has the more beautiful or aesthetically pleasing game. The first time I ever saw Rafa Nadal play tennis I was pretty much instantly mesmerized. I had never seen anything like it, and didn't know how anyone was gonna beat this kid.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News