Started By
Message

re: Referee Harassment Bill

Posted on 6/4/19 at 2:46 pm to
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 6/4/19 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

I can’t think of a reason off hand, that warrants threatening an official.

The bill doesn't say that one must threaten an official to be in violation. It says the official, "feels threatened".

So it is solely a subjective decision of the official.

Again, dangerous precedent. Who does this "special class treatment" go to next? Some privileged political group. maybe?
This post was edited on 6/4/19 at 2:51 pm
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 6/4/19 at 2:48 pm to
quote:


The bill doesn't say that one must threaten an official to be in violation. It says the official, "feels threatened".

So it is solely a subjective decision of the official.

Again, dangerous precedent.





Exactly....so if a fan or coach tells the ump that he's garbage..the ump can throw that person out of the park, call the cops and say he felt threatened.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram