- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2019 Kentucky Derby
Posted on 5/5/19 at 10:27 am to SeeeeK
Posted on 5/5/19 at 10:27 am to SeeeeK
I don't think what happened in the Derby killed horse racing but it definitely doesn't help the sport. I actually think it's a fairly large blow to a sport that has been consistently losing the American public's interest for a while now, and as a horse racing fan I hate this.
Concerning the DQ in the race, I disagree with it (btw I didn't bet on Maximum Security). Yes, if you go by the letter of the law, I can see the argument that Maximum Security could have impeded the path of 2 of the horses, but this race isn't a claiming or allowance race with 7 or 8 horse. It's the freaking Kentucky Derby, where you can have up to 20 horses in it. You can't expect a clean race with that many horses (just look at all the bumping at the start of the race). If you want a clean safe race than lower the number of horses you put in it (which I don't want to see btw). Then you add the rain with this years race and that makes it even messier. Also add the fact that Maximum Security didn't do anything to impede Countrys House, the eventual winner's, path. The horses that complained were also rans. No horse was physically hurt. I just thought it was a DQ that lacked common sense. I would also be willing to bet that if Maximum Security was trained by Bob Baffert rather than Jason Servis that there would be no disqualification.
Concerning the DQ in the race, I disagree with it (btw I didn't bet on Maximum Security). Yes, if you go by the letter of the law, I can see the argument that Maximum Security could have impeded the path of 2 of the horses, but this race isn't a claiming or allowance race with 7 or 8 horse. It's the freaking Kentucky Derby, where you can have up to 20 horses in it. You can't expect a clean race with that many horses (just look at all the bumping at the start of the race). If you want a clean safe race than lower the number of horses you put in it (which I don't want to see btw). Then you add the rain with this years race and that makes it even messier. Also add the fact that Maximum Security didn't do anything to impede Countrys House, the eventual winner's, path. The horses that complained were also rans. No horse was physically hurt. I just thought it was a DQ that lacked common sense. I would also be willing to bet that if Maximum Security was trained by Bob Baffert rather than Jason Servis that there would be no disqualification.
Posted on 5/5/19 at 2:12 pm to Monkeyboy
Well said. Context is important. The Ricky Rulebook’s on here don’t get that part of it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News