- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Dawkins pleas, Alleva is in God's little acre....
Posted on 3/31/19 at 10:23 am to Anaximander
Posted on 3/31/19 at 10:23 am to Anaximander
It’s just as likely that this is the truth as it is the illegal version. That’s why I just don’t get the flame toward Wade and LSU from the national media. The only explanation is that they wanted attention averted away from the actual scandal that is the entire NCAA. You can see that when the powerful are attacked they minimize you at any cost. It’s a sickening ordeal. We may never likely know the full extent of the cheating because these power players don’t want it to and can’t have it come out.
1
Posted on 3/31/19 at 12:07 pm to BayouBengal99
Two men go to rob a bank, one goes in with a gun while the other waits in the car with the engine running. The man in the bank pulls out his gun and says, "Get on the floor, this is a hold up!" He is quickly overwhelmed. What does the man in the car do? He drives off like nothing happened.
Now you want to say that the man with the gun never actually stole anything, and you want to parse his words in such a way as to deny that there was ever any intent to rob the bank in the first place. You further claim that everyone else is stealing money, why can't he?
Meanwhile the getaway driver gets to claim plausible deniability, and you want to blame him for the whole thing going wrong because he didn't go into the bank with guns blazing to help his partner out.
Good luck with all that.
Now you want to say that the man with the gun never actually stole anything, and you want to parse his words in such a way as to deny that there was ever any intent to rob the bank in the first place. You further claim that everyone else is stealing money, why can't he?
Meanwhile the getaway driver gets to claim plausible deniability, and you want to blame him for the whole thing going wrong because he didn't go into the bank with guns blazing to help his partner out.
Good luck with all that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News