Started By
Message

re: NCAA rules Committee expected to change OT and Targeting penalties

Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:55 pm to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83599 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 2:55 pm to
I see.


quote:

No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul.
quote:

No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)



So does that mean a defender HAS to hit with his crown for targeting to be confirmed? Because this would eliminate a ton of these horrible calls. Similar to raising the DUI .08 level but making the punishments much more severe.

I wouldn't mind that. But for some reason I don't think that's how it will be applied.

ETA: I think I misinterpreted what they meant.
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 2:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram