Started By
Message

re: The Recruting Debate on the Offensive Line (There are facts in here. You've been warned)

Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:56 pm to
Posted by ParrishGore
Walker, La.
Member since Aug 2013
939 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:56 pm to
LSU's main problem with it's offense is not the offensive line. It's not who is on the field, it's who is coordinating the players on the field. SE is not good enough to compete with the Sabama's and the Clemson's and the elite in college football. Canada was. But Orgeron fired him. There is no exact science in recruiting which recruits will excel at the collegiate level. You will get some right and get some wrong. The more you sign the better chance you have of getting a good one. The numbers here that stick out to me is the 22 and 18. If LSU wants to start competing with the elite they must put more emphasis on the linemen. That's where games are won and lost, in the trenches.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:10 am to
You say.


quote:

LSU's main problem with it's offense is not the offensive line. It's not who is on the field, it's who is coordinating the players on the field




Then this.


quote:

8. If LSU wants to start competing with the elite they must put more emphasis on the linemen. That's where games are won and lost, in the trenches



Well which is it?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram