- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Recruting Debate on the Offensive Line (There are facts in here. You've been warned)
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:56 pm to koLSU86
Posted on 11/13/18 at 11:56 pm to koLSU86
LSU's main problem with it's offense is not the offensive line. It's not who is on the field, it's who is coordinating the players on the field. SE is not good enough to compete with the Sabama's and the Clemson's and the elite in college football. Canada was. But Orgeron fired him. There is no exact science in recruiting which recruits will excel at the collegiate level. You will get some right and get some wrong. The more you sign the better chance you have of getting a good one. The numbers here that stick out to me is the 22 and 18. If LSU wants to start competing with the elite they must put more emphasis on the linemen. That's where games are won and lost, in the trenches.
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:10 am to ParrishGore
You say.
Then this.
Well which is it?
quote:
LSU's main problem with it's offense is not the offensive line. It's not who is on the field, it's who is coordinating the players on the field
Then this.
quote:
8. If LSU wants to start competing with the elite they must put more emphasis on the linemen. That's where games are won and lost, in the trenches
Well which is it?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News