Was it? That is certainly what the article says, but the OP says “Avenatti Hit With More Unpaid Debt. Owes Dillanos Coffee CEO $110,000,” NOT that Dillanos makes that claim.

In any case, multiple Google searches see this matter appearing in EXACTLY one publication ... one that fawns over Trump.

You are an attorney. Do you not find it odd to see someone claiming that a shareholder is liable on an obvious corporate debt?

Would an objective reporter not have made further inquiry on this point?

Do you not see the POSSIBILITY that this publication INTENTIONALLY did not pursue such inquiry, due to its sycophancy to Trump?

This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 12:30 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by BBONDS25

Member since Mar 2008

49047 posts

Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86

quote:
You are an attorney. Do you not find it odd to see someone claiming that a shareholder is liable on an obvious corporate debt?

I also own several businesses. It is not uncommon for a personal guarantee to be required by suppliers. I don’t work with suppliers that require a personal harsher, but it isn’t uncommon in the business world.

Additionally, the entitle Avenatti owns is an LLC...while an LLC is specifically non-corporate, there are cases in nearly every jurisdiction where acts of a Member that are deemed fraudulent can have the same effect as piercing the corporate veil. If avenatti intentionally misled the supplier he could be personally liable.

Again...you wan to argue semantics, because you think orange man is bad.
And defending Avenatti or even arguing semantics of who is on the hook for the bad debt he took on is very strange.

This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 12:45 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board